Point transect surveys for songbirds: robust methodologies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Point-tran sect sampling is widely used for monitoring trends in abundance of songbirds. It is conceptualized as a "snapshot" method in which birds are "frozen" at a single location. With conventional methods, an observer records birds detected from a point for several minutes, during which birds may move around. This generates upward bias in the density estimate. I compared this conventional approach with two other approaches: in one, the observer records locations of detected birds at a snapshot moment; in the other, distances to detected cues (songbursts), rather than birds, are recorded. I implemented all three approaches, together with line-transect sampling and territory mapping in a survey of four bird species. The conventional method gave a biased estimate of density for one species. The snapshot method was found to be the most efficient of the point-sampling methods. Line-transect sampling proved more efficient than the point-sampling methods for all four species. This is likely to be generally true, provided that terrain and habitat allow easy use of a design with random transect lines. I concluded that the snapshot method is more appropriate than the conventional timed-count method for surveying songbirds. Although precision was rather poor with the cue-based method (partly because too few resources were devoted to cue rate estimation), it may be particularly useful for some single-species surveys. In addition, it is the only valid method for estimating abundance from Surveys in which acoustic equipment is used to detect birds.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)345-357
Number of pages13
JournalThe Auk
Volume123
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2006

Keywords

  • cue-count survey
  • line-transect sampling
  • point-transect sampling
  • snapshot method
  • DESIGN

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Point transect surveys for songbirds: robust methodologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this