Abstract
Growing research effort has shown that physical enrichment (PE) can
improve fish welfare and research validity. However, the inclusion of PE
does not always result in positive effects and conflicting findings
have highlighted the many nuances involved. Effects are known to depend
on species and life stage tested, but effects may also vary with
differences in the specific items used as enrichment between and within
studies. Reporting fine-scale characteristics of items used as
enrichment in studies may help to reveal these factors. We conducted a
survey of PE-focused studies published in the last 5 years to examine
the current state of methodological reporting. The survey results
suggest that some aspects of enrichment are not adequately detailed. For
example, the amount and dimensions of objects used as enrichment were
frequently omitted. Similarly, the ecological relevance, or other
justification, for enrichment items was frequently not made explicit.
Focusing on ecologically relevant aspects of PE and increasing the level
of detail reported in studies may benefit future work and we propose a
framework with the acronym DETAILS (Dimensions, Ecological rationale, Timing of enrichment, Amount, Inputs, Lighting and Social
environment). We outline the potential importance of each of the
elements of this framework with the hope it may aid in the level of
reporting and standardization across studies, ultimately aiding the
search for more beneficial types of PE and the development of our
understanding and ability to improve the welfare of captive fish and
promote more biologically relevant behaviour.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 14773 |
Pages (from-to) | 704-725 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Journal of Fish Biology |
Volume | 99 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 4 May 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 20 Sept 2021 |
Keywords
- Environmental complexity
- Environmental enrichment
- Fish husbandry
- Fish welfare
- Structural complexity
- Structural enrichment