Abstract
There is substantial evidence for human infants' use of 2 different number processing systems, Object-File System and Approximate Number System; however, the majority of studies of non-human primates reveal processing via Approximate Number System only. The present study investigated whether apes use the Object-File System when tested with an entity-first design, often used in infant studies. Apes' performance was consistently ratio-dependent and showed no sign of an Object-File System, regardless of entity type (rigid and flexible cohesive objects vs. non-cohesive powder and liquid). After ruling out other low-level explanations, our results suggest that great apes relied solely on an Approximate Number System. These results are discussed in light of a possible developmental difference between human infants and adult great apes. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 79-95 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Cognitive Development |
| Volume | 31 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Keywords
- Number processing
- Discrete quantity
- Continuous quantity
- Analog magnitudes
- Non-cohesive substances
- Great apes
- CHIMPANZEES PAN-TROGLODYTES
- SEQUENTIALLY PRESENTED SETS
- ORANGUTANS PONGO-PYGMAEUS
- RANGING RHESUS-MONKEYS
- BY-ONE ADDITION
- NUMBER REPRESENTATION
- GREAT APES
- NUMERICAL REPRESENTATIONS
- PERCEPTUAL STRATEGIES
- LIQUID CONSERVATION
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Phylogenetic roots of quantity processing: Apes do not rely on object indexing to process quantities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver