Phylogenetic roots of quantity processing: Apes do not rely on object indexing to process quantities

Trix Cacchione*, Christine Hrubesch, Josep Call

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is substantial evidence for human infants' use of 2 different number processing systems, Object-File System and Approximate Number System; however, the majority of studies of non-human primates reveal processing via Approximate Number System only. The present study investigated whether apes use the Object-File System when tested with an entity-first design, often used in infant studies. Apes' performance was consistently ratio-dependent and showed no sign of an Object-File System, regardless of entity type (rigid and flexible cohesive objects vs. non-cohesive powder and liquid). After ruling out other low-level explanations, our results suggest that great apes relied solely on an Approximate Number System. These results are discussed in light of a possible developmental difference between human infants and adult great apes. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-95
Number of pages17
JournalCognitive Development
Volume31
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Number processing
  • Discrete quantity
  • Continuous quantity
  • Analog magnitudes
  • Non-cohesive substances
  • Great apes
  • CHIMPANZEES PAN-TROGLODYTES
  • SEQUENTIALLY PRESENTED SETS
  • ORANGUTANS PONGO-PYGMAEUS
  • RANGING RHESUS-MONKEYS
  • BY-ONE ADDITION
  • NUMBER REPRESENTATION
  • GREAT APES
  • NUMERICAL REPRESENTATIONS
  • PERCEPTUAL STRATEGIES
  • LIQUID CONSERVATION

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phylogenetic roots of quantity processing: Apes do not rely on object indexing to process quantities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this