TY - JOUR
T1 - Philosophical analysis and social kinds. Gender and race
T2 - II - Jennifer Saul
AU - Haslanger, Sally
AU - Saul, Jennifer
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - Sally Haslanger's 'What Good Are Our Intuitions? Philosophical Analysis and Social Kinds' is, among other things, a part of the theoretical underpinning for analyses of race and gender concepts that she discusses far more fully elsewhere. My reply focuses on these analyses of race and gender concepts, exploring the ways in which the theoretical work done in this paper and others can or cannot be used to defend these analyses against certain objections. I argue that the problems faced by Haslanger's analyses are in some ways less serious, and in some ways more serious, than they may at first appear. Along the way, I suggest that ordinary speakers may not in fact have race and gender concepts and I explore the ramifications of this claim.
AB - Sally Haslanger's 'What Good Are Our Intuitions? Philosophical Analysis and Social Kinds' is, among other things, a part of the theoretical underpinning for analyses of race and gender concepts that she discusses far more fully elsewhere. My reply focuses on these analyses of race and gender concepts, exploring the ways in which the theoretical work done in this paper and others can or cannot be used to defend these analyses against certain objections. I argue that the problems faced by Haslanger's analyses are in some ways less serious, and in some ways more serious, than they may at first appear. Along the way, I suggest that ordinary speakers may not in fact have race and gender concepts and I explore the ramifications of this claim.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60949356641&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.0066-7373.2006.00129.x
DO - 10.1111/j.0066-7373.2006.00129.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:60949356641
SN - 0066-7374
VL - 106
SP - 119
EP - 143
JO - Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society
JF - Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society
IS - 1
ER -