Pharmaceutical pictograms for low-literate patients: understanding, risk of false confidence, and evidence-based design strategies

Mara M. van Beusekom; Anne M. Land-Zandstra; Mark J.W. Bos; Jos M. van den Broek; Henk-Jan Guchelaar

doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.015

Pharmaceutical pictograms for low-literate patients: understanding, risk of false confidence, and evidence-based design strategies

Mara M. van Beusekom, Anne M. Land-Zandstra, Mark J.W. Bos, Jos M. van den Broek, Henk-Jan Guchelaar

School of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to (1) evaluate ten pharmaceutical pictograms for low-literate patients on understandability, (2) assess the risk of false confidence in understanding, and (3) identify how the design can be improved to increase understandability.

Methods: Interviews were conducted with n=197 pharmacy visitors in the Netherlands. Additional qualitative discussions were held with n=30 adequately and n=25 low-literate participants (assessed with REALM-D). Qualitative data were analysed using the Thematic Framework approach.

Results: Half of the pictograms reached 67% understanding (31.0%-98.5%); two did in the low-literate group. Three pictograms showed a risk for false confidence. Pictograms appeared to be most effective when people were familiar with their visual elements and messages.

Conclusion: Low-literate people have more difficulty understanding pictograms than people with adequate literacy. While the risk of false confidence is low, for critical safety information, 67% understanding might not be sufficient. Design strategies for pharmaceutical pictograms should focus on familiarity, simplicity, and showing the intake and effect of medicine.

Practice implications: Health professionals should go over the meaning of pictograms when providing drug information to patients to increase patients' familiarity with the message and to ensure that all pictograms are sufficiently understood.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	966-973
Number of pages	8
Journal	Patient Education and Counseling
Volume	100
Issue number	5
Early online date	19 Dec 2016
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.015
Publication status	Published - May 2017

Keywords

Adult
Audiovisual aids
Comprehension
Drug labeling/methods
Female

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.015

van-Beusekom-2019-Pharmaceutical-pictograms-PEC-AAM
© 2016, Elsevier Ireland Ltd. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher's policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.015
Accepted author manuscript, 555 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

1 Article
1 Review article

The extent and effects of patient involvement in pictogram design for written drug information: a short systematic review
van Beusekom, M. M., Kerkhoven, A. H., Bos, M. J. W., Guchelaar, H.-J. & van den Broek, J. M., Jun 2018, In: Drug Discovery Today. 23, 6, p. 1312-1318 7 p.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Open Access
File
Low literacy and written drug information: information-seeking, leaflet evaluation and preferences, and roles for images
van Beusekom, M. M., Grootens-Wiegers, P., Bos, M. J. W., Guchelaar, H.-J. & van den Broek, J. M., Dec 2016, In: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. 38, 6, p. 1372-1379 8 p.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Open Access
File

Cite this

@article{76dba35a09ef4943b94ef92a27f078c1,

title = "Pharmaceutical pictograms for low-literate patients: understanding, risk of false confidence, and evidence-based design strategies",

abstract = "Objective: This study aims to (1) evaluate ten pharmaceutical pictograms for low-literate patients on understandability, (2) assess the risk of false confidence in understanding, and (3) identify how the design can be improved to increase understandability.Methods: Interviews were conducted with n=197 pharmacy visitors in the Netherlands. Additional qualitative discussions were held with n=30 adequately and n=25 low-literate participants (assessed with REALM-D). Qualitative data were analysed using the Thematic Framework approach.Results: Half of the pictograms reached 67% understanding (31.0%-98.5%); two did in the low-literate group. Three pictograms showed a risk for false confidence. Pictograms appeared to be most effective when people were familiar with their visual elements and messages.Conclusion: Low-literate people have more difficulty understanding pictograms than people with adequate literacy. While the risk of false confidence is low, for critical safety information, 67% understanding might not be sufficient. Design strategies for pharmaceutical pictograms should focus on familiarity, simplicity, and showing the intake and effect of medicine.Practice implications: Health professionals should go over the meaning of pictograms when providing drug information to patients to increase patients' familiarity with the message and to ensure that all pictograms are sufficiently understood.",

keywords = "Adult, Audiovisual aids, Comprehension, Drug labeling/methods, Female",

author = "{van Beusekom}, {Mara M.} and Land-Zandstra, {Anne M.} and Bos, {Mark J.W.} and {van den Broek}, {Jos M.} and Henk-Jan Guchelaar",

year = "2017",

month = may,

doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.015",

language = "English",

volume = "100",

pages = "966--973",

journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",

issn = "0738-3991",

publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pharmaceutical pictograms for low-literate patients

T2 - understanding, risk of false confidence, and evidence-based design strategies

AU - van Beusekom, Mara M.

AU - Land-Zandstra, Anne M.

AU - Bos, Mark J.W.

AU - van den Broek, Jos M.

AU - Guchelaar, Henk-Jan

PY - 2017/5

Y1 - 2017/5

N2 - Objective: This study aims to (1) evaluate ten pharmaceutical pictograms for low-literate patients on understandability, (2) assess the risk of false confidence in understanding, and (3) identify how the design can be improved to increase understandability.Methods: Interviews were conducted with n=197 pharmacy visitors in the Netherlands. Additional qualitative discussions were held with n=30 adequately and n=25 low-literate participants (assessed with REALM-D). Qualitative data were analysed using the Thematic Framework approach.Results: Half of the pictograms reached 67% understanding (31.0%-98.5%); two did in the low-literate group. Three pictograms showed a risk for false confidence. Pictograms appeared to be most effective when people were familiar with their visual elements and messages.Conclusion: Low-literate people have more difficulty understanding pictograms than people with adequate literacy. While the risk of false confidence is low, for critical safety information, 67% understanding might not be sufficient. Design strategies for pharmaceutical pictograms should focus on familiarity, simplicity, and showing the intake and effect of medicine.Practice implications: Health professionals should go over the meaning of pictograms when providing drug information to patients to increase patients' familiarity with the message and to ensure that all pictograms are sufficiently understood.

AB - Objective: This study aims to (1) evaluate ten pharmaceutical pictograms for low-literate patients on understandability, (2) assess the risk of false confidence in understanding, and (3) identify how the design can be improved to increase understandability.Methods: Interviews were conducted with n=197 pharmacy visitors in the Netherlands. Additional qualitative discussions were held with n=30 adequately and n=25 low-literate participants (assessed with REALM-D). Qualitative data were analysed using the Thematic Framework approach.Results: Half of the pictograms reached 67% understanding (31.0%-98.5%); two did in the low-literate group. Three pictograms showed a risk for false confidence. Pictograms appeared to be most effective when people were familiar with their visual elements and messages.Conclusion: Low-literate people have more difficulty understanding pictograms than people with adequate literacy. While the risk of false confidence is low, for critical safety information, 67% understanding might not be sufficient. Design strategies for pharmaceutical pictograms should focus on familiarity, simplicity, and showing the intake and effect of medicine.Practice implications: Health professionals should go over the meaning of pictograms when providing drug information to patients to increase patients' familiarity with the message and to ensure that all pictograms are sufficiently understood.

KW - Adult

KW - Audiovisual aids

KW - Comprehension

KW - Drug labeling/methods

KW - Female

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.015

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 28043712

SN - 0738-3991

VL - 100

SP - 966

EP - 973

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

IS - 5

ER -

Pharmaceutical pictograms for low-literate patients: understanding, risk of false confidence, and evidence-based design strategies

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Research output

The extent and effects of patient involvement in pictogram design for written drug information: a short systematic review

Low literacy and written drug information: information-seeking, leaflet evaluation and preferences, and roles for images

Cite this