Perpetual present: Henri Bergson and atemporal duration

Matyáš Moravec*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that adjusting Stump and Kretzmann's "atemporal duration" with la durée, a key concept in the philosophy of Henri Bergson (1859-1941), can respond to the most significant objections aimed at Stump and Kretzmann's re-interpretation of Boethian eternity. This paper deals with three of these objections: the incoherence of the notion of "atemporal duration," the impossibility of this duration being time-like, and the problems involved in conceiving it as being related to temporal duration by a relation of analogy. I conclude that "atemporal duration" (which has unfortunately come to be regarded with suspicion by most analytic philosophers of religion) - when combined with Bergson's durée to become an "atemporal durée" - is a coherent understanding of divine eternity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)197-224
Number of pages28
JournalEuropean Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 19 Sept 2019


Dive into the research topics of 'Perpetual present: Henri Bergson and atemporal duration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this