Performativity matters: economic description as a moral problem

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter


    If performativity theory simply repeats that economists design markets, much of its radicalism is lost. Instead, researchers must consider the mechanisms by which economization transforms social arrangements. This chapter develops the argument that economic description constitutes aspects of the social as economic. Following Austin and Butler, I argue that such description has a performative force, and is therefore politically and ethically charged. I suggest that an understanding of economic description as performative explains how economics can at once constitute and claim authority over an object. The chapter explores how economic description transforms social relations. It connects performativity theory to existing critiques of economic relations, and suggests that performativity research can develop ethically rich narratives without losing theoretical or empirical rigour. Finally it urges performativity research to rediscover its radicalism in its ability to unseat the ‘metaphysical presumptions’ of economics.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationEnacting Dismal Science
    Subtitle of host publicationNew Perspectives on the Performativity of Economics
    EditorsIvan Boldyrev, Ekaterina Svetlova
    ISBN (Electronic)978-1-137-48876-3
    ISBN (Print)978-1-137-49210-4, 978-1-349-69681-9
    Publication statusPublished - 25 Aug 2016

    Publication series

    NamePerspectives from Social Economics
    PublisherPalgrave Macmillan


    Dive into the research topics of 'Performativity matters: economic description as a moral problem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this