Abstract
I distinguish between two kinds of sensorimotor expectations: agent- and object-active ones. Alva Noë's answer to the problem of how perception acquires volumetric content illicitly privileges agent-active expectations over object-active expectations, though the two are explanatorily on a par. Considerations which Noë draws upon concerning how organisms may ‘off-load’ internal processes onto the environment do not support his view that volumetric content depends on our embodiment; rather, they support a view of experience which is restrictive of the body's role in perception. My objections undercut central arguments which Noë gives for his brand of enactivism.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 383-391 |
Journal | The Philosophical Quarterly |
Volume | 61 |
Issue number | 243 |
Early online date | 17 Dec 2010 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2011 |