Partner (dis)agreement on moving desires and the subsequent moving behaviour of couples

Rory Coulter, Maarten van Ham, Peteke Feijten

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    44 Citations (Scopus)


    Most studies of residential mobility decision-making focus on the housing and neighbourhood satisfaction and pre-move thoughts of individuals. This implicitly assumes that individual evaluations represent the wider household unit. However, if partners in a couple do not share evaluations of dwelling or neighbourhood quality or do not agree on whether moving is (un)desirable, ignoring these disagreements will lead to an inaccurate assessment of the strength of the links between moving desires and actual moves. Although overlooked in studies of residential mobility, partner disagreement plays an important role in the literature on family migration. This study is, therefore, one of the first to investigate disagreements in moving desires between partners and the subsequent consequences of such disagreements for moving behaviour. Drawing on British Household Panel Survey data and concepts from family migration studies, we find that disagreement about the desirability of moving is most likely where partners do not share perceptions of housing stress. Panel logistic regression models show that the moving desires of both partners interact to affect the moving behaviour of couples. Only 7.6% of couples move if only the man desires to move, whereas 20.1% of shared moving desires lead to a subsequent move.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)16-30
    Number of pages15
    JournalPopulation, Space and Place
    Issue number1
    Early online date17 Nov 2011
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012


    • Residential mobility
    • Household decision-making
    • Moving desires
    • Partner disagreements
    • Satisfaction


    Dive into the research topics of 'Partner (dis)agreement on moving desires and the subsequent moving behaviour of couples'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this