TY - JOUR
T1 - Pan-tropical prediction of forest structure from the largest trees
AU - Bastin, Jean François
AU - Rutishauser, Ervan
AU - Kellner, James R.
AU - Saatchi, Sassan
AU - Pélissier, Raphael
AU - Hérault, Bruno
AU - Slik, Ferry
AU - Bogaert, Jan
AU - De Cannière, Charles
AU - Marshall, Andrew R.
AU - Poulsen, John
AU - Alvarez-Loyayza, Patricia
AU - Andrade, Ana
AU - Angbonga-Basia, Albert
AU - Araujo-Murakami, Alejandro
AU - Arroyo, Luzmila
AU - Ayyappan, Narayanan
AU - de Azevedo, Celso Paulo
AU - Banki, Olaf
AU - Barbier, Nicolas
AU - Barroso, Jorcely G.
AU - Beeckman, Hans
AU - Bitariho, Robert
AU - Boeckx, Pascal
AU - Boehning-Gaese, Katrin
AU - Brandão, Hilandia
AU - Brearley, Francis Q.
AU - Breuer Ndoundou Hockemba, Mireille
AU - Brienen, Roel
AU - Camargo, Jose Luis C.
AU - Campos-Arceiz, Ahimsa
AU - Cassart, Benoit
AU - Chave, Jérôme
AU - Chazdon, Robin
AU - Chuyong, Georges
AU - Clark, David B.
AU - Clark, Connie J.
AU - Condit, Richard
AU - Honorio Coronado, Euridice N.
AU - Davidar, Priya
AU - de Haulleville, Thalès
AU - Descroix, Laurent
AU - Doucet, Jean Louis
AU - Dourdain, Aurelie
AU - Droissart, Vincent
AU - Duncan, Thomas
AU - Silva Espejo, Javier
AU - Espinosa, Santiago
AU - Farwig, Nina
AU - Fayolle, Adeline
N1 - Funding Information:
J.‐F.B. was supported for data collection by the FRIA‐FNRS (Fond National pour la Recherche Scientifique), ERAIFT (Ecole Régionale Post‐Universitaire d’Aménagement et de Gestion Intégrés des Forêts Tropicales), World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) (...) WWF and by the CoForTips project (ANR‐12‐EBID‐0002); T.d.H. was supported by the COBIMFO project (Congo Basin integrated mon‐ itoring for forest carbon mitigation and biodiversity) funded by the Belgian Science Policy Office (Belspo); C.H.G. was supported by the ‘Sud Expert Plantes’ project of French Foreign Affairs, CIRAD and SCAC. Some of the data in this paper were provided by the RAINFOR Network, the AfriTRON network, TEAM Network, the partnership between Conservation International, The Missouri Botanical Garden, The Smithsonian Institution and The Wildlife Conservation Society and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. We acknowledge data contributions from the TEAM network not listed as co‐authors (upon a voluntary basis). We thank Jean‐Phillipe Puyravaud, Estação CientD?fica Ferreira Penna (MPEG) and the Andrew Mellon Foundation and National Science Foundation (DEB 0742830). The forest plots in Nova Xavantina and Southern Amazonia, Brazil were funded by grants from Project PELD‐CNPq/FAPEMAT (403725/2012‐7; 441244/2016‐5; 164131/2013); CNPq‐PPBio (457602/2012‐0); productivity grants (CNPq/PQ‐2) to B. H. Marimon‐Junior and B. S. Marimon; Project USA‐NAS/PEER (#PGA‐2000005316) and Project ReFlor FAPEMAT 0589267/2016. Finally, we thank Helen Muller‐Landau for her careful revision and comments on the manuscript.
Funding Information:
J.-F.B. was supported for data collection by the FRIA-FNRS (Fond National pour la Recherche Scientifique), ERAIFT (Ecole R?gionale Post-Universitaire d'Am?nagement et de Gestion Int?gr?s des For?ts Tropicales), World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) and by the CoForTips project (ANR-12-EBID-0002); T.d.H. was supported by the COBIMFO project (Congo Basin integrated monitoring for forest carbon mitigation and biodiversity) funded by the Belgian Science Policy Office (Belspo); C.H.G. was supported by the ?Sud Expert Plantes? project of French Foreign Affairs, CIRAD and SCAC. Some of the data in this paper were provided by the RAINFOR Network, the AfriTRON network, TEAM Network, the partnership between Conservation International, The Missouri Botanical Garden, The Smithsonian Institution and The Wildlife Conservation Society and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. We acknowledge data contributions from the TEAM network not listed as co-authors (upon a voluntary basis). We thank Jean-Phillipe Puyravaud, Esta??o Cient?fica Ferreira Penna (MPEG) and the Andrew Mellon Foundation and National Science Foundation (DEB 0742830). The forest plots in Nova Xavantina and Southern Amazonia, Brazil were funded by grants from Project PELD-CNPq/FAPEMAT (403725/2012-7; 441244/2016-5; 164131/2013); CNPq-PPBio (457602/2012-0); productivity grants (CNPq/PQ-2) to B. H. Marimon-Junior and B. S. Marimon; Project USA-NAS/PEER (#PGA-2000005316) and Project ReFlor FAPEMAT 0589267/2016. Finally, we thank Helen Muller-Landau for her careful revision and comments on the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2018/11/1
Y1 - 2018/11/1
N2 - Aim: Large tropical trees form the interface between ground and airborne observations, offering a unique opportunity to capture forest properties remotely and to investigate their variations on broad scales. However, despite rapid development of metrics to characterize the forest canopy from remotely sensed data, a gap remains between aerial and field inventories. To close this gap, we propose a new pan-tropical model to predict plot-level forest structure properties and biomass from only the largest trees. Location: Pan-tropical. Time period: Early 21st century. Major taxa studied: Woody plants. Methods: Using a dataset of 867 plots distributed among 118 sites across the tropics, we tested the prediction of the quadratic mean diameter, basal area, Lorey's height, community wood density and aboveground biomass (AGB) from the ith largest trees. Results: Measuring the largest trees in tropical forests enables unbiased predictions of plot- and site-level forest structure. The 20 largest trees per hectare predicted quadratic mean diameter, basal area, Lorey's height, community wood density and AGB with 12, 16, 4, 4 and 17.7% of relative error, respectively. Most of the remaining error in biomass prediction is driven by differences in the proportion of total biomass held in medium-sized trees (50–70 cm diameter at breast height), which shows some continental dependency, with American tropical forests presenting the highest proportion of total biomass in these intermediate-diameter classes relative to other continents. Main conclusions: Our approach provides new information on tropical forest structure and can be used to generate accurate field estimates of tropical forest carbon stocks to support the calibration and validation of current and forthcoming space missions. It will reduce the cost of field inventories and contribute to scientific understanding of tropical forest ecosystems and response to climate change.
AB - Aim: Large tropical trees form the interface between ground and airborne observations, offering a unique opportunity to capture forest properties remotely and to investigate their variations on broad scales. However, despite rapid development of metrics to characterize the forest canopy from remotely sensed data, a gap remains between aerial and field inventories. To close this gap, we propose a new pan-tropical model to predict plot-level forest structure properties and biomass from only the largest trees. Location: Pan-tropical. Time period: Early 21st century. Major taxa studied: Woody plants. Methods: Using a dataset of 867 plots distributed among 118 sites across the tropics, we tested the prediction of the quadratic mean diameter, basal area, Lorey's height, community wood density and aboveground biomass (AGB) from the ith largest trees. Results: Measuring the largest trees in tropical forests enables unbiased predictions of plot- and site-level forest structure. The 20 largest trees per hectare predicted quadratic mean diameter, basal area, Lorey's height, community wood density and AGB with 12, 16, 4, 4 and 17.7% of relative error, respectively. Most of the remaining error in biomass prediction is driven by differences in the proportion of total biomass held in medium-sized trees (50–70 cm diameter at breast height), which shows some continental dependency, with American tropical forests presenting the highest proportion of total biomass in these intermediate-diameter classes relative to other continents. Main conclusions: Our approach provides new information on tropical forest structure and can be used to generate accurate field estimates of tropical forest carbon stocks to support the calibration and validation of current and forthcoming space missions. It will reduce the cost of field inventories and contribute to scientific understanding of tropical forest ecosystems and response to climate change.
KW - carbon
KW - climate change
KW - forest structure
KW - large trees
KW - pan-tropical
KW - REDD+
KW - tropical forest ecology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054871795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/geb.12803
DO - 10.1111/geb.12803
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85054871795
SN - 1466-822X
VL - 27
SP - 1366
EP - 1383
JO - Global Ecology and Biogeography
JF - Global Ecology and Biogeography
IS - 11
ER -