TY - JOUR
T1 - Outsourcing the business of development
T2 - the rise of for-profit consultancies in the UK aid sector
AU - Whitty, Brendan
AU - Sklair, Jessica
AU - Gilbert, Paul
AU - Mawdsley, Emma
AU - Russon, Jo-Anna
AU - Taylor, Olivia G
N1 - Funding: Economic and Social Research Council - ES/V01269X/1.
PY - 2023/7/31
Y1 - 2023/7/31
N2 - While much attention has been paid to the ways in which the private sector is now embedded within the field of development, one group of actors — for-profit development consultancies and contractors, or service providers — has received relatively little attention. This article analyses the growing role of for-profit consultancies and contractors in British aid delivery, which has been driven by two key trends: first, the outsourcing of managerial, audit and knowledge-management functions as part of efforts to bring private sector approaches and skills into public spending on aid; and second, the reconfiguration of aid spending towards markets and the private sector, and away from locally embedded, state-focused aid programming. The authors argue that both trends were launched under New Labour in the early 2000s, and super-charged under successive Conservative governments. The resulting entanglement means that the policies and practices of the UK government's aid agencies, and the interests and forms of for-profit service providers, are increasingly mutually constitutive. Amongst other implications, this shift acts to displace traditional forms of contestation and accountability of aid delivery.
AB - While much attention has been paid to the ways in which the private sector is now embedded within the field of development, one group of actors — for-profit development consultancies and contractors, or service providers — has received relatively little attention. This article analyses the growing role of for-profit consultancies and contractors in British aid delivery, which has been driven by two key trends: first, the outsourcing of managerial, audit and knowledge-management functions as part of efforts to bring private sector approaches and skills into public spending on aid; and second, the reconfiguration of aid spending towards markets and the private sector, and away from locally embedded, state-focused aid programming. The authors argue that both trends were launched under New Labour in the early 2000s, and super-charged under successive Conservative governments. The resulting entanglement means that the policies and practices of the UK government's aid agencies, and the interests and forms of for-profit service providers, are increasingly mutually constitutive. Amongst other implications, this shift acts to displace traditional forms of contestation and accountability of aid delivery.
U2 - 10.1111/dech.12782
DO - 10.1111/dech.12782
M3 - Article
SN - 0012-155X
VL - 54
SP - 892
EP - 917
JO - Development and Change
JF - Development and Change
IS - 4
ER -