TY - JOUR
T1 - On What It is To Be in a Quandary
AU - Greenough, Patrick Michael
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - A number of serious problems are raised against Crispin Wright’s quandary conception of vagueness. Two alternative conceptions of the quandary view are proposed instead. The first conception retains Wright’s thesis that, for all one knows, a verdict concerning a borderline case constitutes knowledge. However a further problem is seen to beset this conception. The second conception, in response to this further problem, does not enjoin the thesis that, for all one knows, a verdict concerning a borderline case constitutes knowledge. The result is a much simpler and more plausible version of the quandary view.
AB - A number of serious problems are raised against Crispin Wright’s quandary conception of vagueness. Two alternative conceptions of the quandary view are proposed instead. The first conception retains Wright’s thesis that, for all one knows, a verdict concerning a borderline case constitutes knowledge. However a further problem is seen to beset this conception. The second conception, in response to this further problem, does not enjoin the thesis that, for all one knows, a verdict concerning a borderline case constitutes knowledge. The result is a much simpler and more plausible version of the quandary view.
KW - Ignorance
KW - Quandary
KW - Indeterminacy
KW - Permissible disagreement
KW - Vagueness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70449533159&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.springerlink.com/content/f537412506358243/
U2 - 10.1007/s11229-008-9317-7
DO - 10.1007/s11229-008-9317-7
M3 - Article
SN - 0039-7857
VL - 171
JO - Synthese
JF - Synthese
IS - 3
ER -