Ockham and Buridan on the ampliation of modal propositions

S. Johnston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper explores a currently unnoticed argument used by John Buridan to defend his analysis of modal propositions and to reject the analysis of modal propositions of necessity put forward by William of Ockham. First, I explore this argument and, by considering possible responses of Ockham to Buridan, show some of the ways in which Ockham seems to be keeping closer to Aristotle's remarks about modal propositions in Prior Analytics, 18.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal for the History of Philosophy
Early online date30 Jan 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • John Buridan
  • William of Ockham
  • Ampliation
  • Modality
  • Supposition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ockham and Buridan on the ampliation of modal propositions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this