TY - JOUR
T1 - Oceanic drivers of sei whale distribution in the North Atlantic
AU - Houghton, Lucy
AU - Ramirez-Martinez, Nadya
AU - Mikkelsen, Bjarni
AU - Víkingsson, Gísli
AU - Gunnlaugsson, Thorvaldur
AU - Øien, Nils
AU - Hammond, Philip
N1 - NRM was supported by Colciencias (Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación, Colombia), the University of St Andrews, and NAMMCO.
PY - 2020/5/6
Y1 - 2020/5/6
N2 - This study investigated the oceanic drivers of sei whale (Balaenoptera borealis)
distribution in the central and eastern North Atlantic, and explored
how distribution may have changed over almost three decades. Cetacean
sightings data were available from Icelandic, Faroese and Norwegian
surveys conducted throughout the central and eastern North Atlantic
during summer between 1987 and 2015. Effective strip half width was
estimated from the data to take account of variation in detection
probability. Spatially-referenced environmental variables used as
predictors in generalised additive models of sei whale relative density
included: relief-related variables seabed depth, slope and aspect;
monthly-varying physical oceanographic variables sea surface temperature
(SST), mixed layer depth, bottom temperature, salinity, and sea surface
height anomaly (SSH); and monthly-varying biological oceanographic
variables chlorophyll-a concentration and primary productivity.
Preliminary analysis considered which month (March-August) in the
dynamic oceanographic variables explained most variability in sei whale
density. Models including all variables (“full models”) could only be
run for 1998-2015 because data for several variables were missing in
earlier years. “Simple models" including only relief-related variables
and SST were therefore run for 1987-89, and also for 1998-2015 for
comparison. The best-fitting full model for 1998-2015 retained the
covariates depth, May SST, May bottom temperature, July salinity, July
SSH and July primary productivity. Of these, depth, May SST and July SSH
were the strongest predictors of sei whale density. In the simple
models for both 1987-89 and 1998-2015, depth (especially), May SST and
seabed slope were the strongest predictors of sei whale density. The
highest densities of sei whales were predicted in the Irminger Sea and
over the Charles-Gibbs Fracture Zone; a pattern driven by large negative
SSH, deep water (>1500m) and polar-temperate SST (5-12oC).
There was some inter-annual variability in predicted distribution and
there appears to be a northward expansion in distribution consistent
with prey species responding to ocean warming. The models could be used
to predict future distribution of sei whales based on future
environmental conditions predicted by climate models.
AB - This study investigated the oceanic drivers of sei whale (Balaenoptera borealis)
distribution in the central and eastern North Atlantic, and explored
how distribution may have changed over almost three decades. Cetacean
sightings data were available from Icelandic, Faroese and Norwegian
surveys conducted throughout the central and eastern North Atlantic
during summer between 1987 and 2015. Effective strip half width was
estimated from the data to take account of variation in detection
probability. Spatially-referenced environmental variables used as
predictors in generalised additive models of sei whale relative density
included: relief-related variables seabed depth, slope and aspect;
monthly-varying physical oceanographic variables sea surface temperature
(SST), mixed layer depth, bottom temperature, salinity, and sea surface
height anomaly (SSH); and monthly-varying biological oceanographic
variables chlorophyll-a concentration and primary productivity.
Preliminary analysis considered which month (March-August) in the
dynamic oceanographic variables explained most variability in sei whale
density. Models including all variables (“full models”) could only be
run for 1998-2015 because data for several variables were missing in
earlier years. “Simple models" including only relief-related variables
and SST were therefore run for 1987-89, and also for 1998-2015 for
comparison. The best-fitting full model for 1998-2015 retained the
covariates depth, May SST, May bottom temperature, July salinity, July
SSH and July primary productivity. Of these, depth, May SST and July SSH
were the strongest predictors of sei whale density. In the simple
models for both 1987-89 and 1998-2015, depth (especially), May SST and
seabed slope were the strongest predictors of sei whale density. The
highest densities of sei whales were predicted in the Irminger Sea and
over the Charles-Gibbs Fracture Zone; a pattern driven by large negative
SSH, deep water (>1500m) and polar-temperate SST (5-12oC).
There was some inter-annual variability in predicted distribution and
there appears to be a northward expansion in distribution consistent
with prey species responding to ocean warming. The models could be used
to predict future distribution of sei whales based on future
environmental conditions predicted by climate models.
KW - Distribution
KW - Habitat
KW - Cetacean surveys
KW - Sei whale
KW - North Atlantic
KW - Generalized additive models
KW - Predictive maps
U2 - 10.7557/3.5211
DO - 10.7557/3.5211
M3 - Article
SN - 1560-2206
VL - 11
JO - NAMMCO Scientific Publications
JF - NAMMCO Scientific Publications
ER -