New evidence on the suggestibility of memory: The role of retrieval-induced forgetting in misinformation effects.

J Saunders, Malcolm David MacLeod

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Extending recent work that has demonstrated that the act of remembering can result in the inhibition of related items in memory, the present research examined whether retrieval-induced forgetting could provide a mechanism for explaining misinformation effects. Specifically, the authors found in their first study that the inhibition of critical items rendered the recollection of postevent information more likely in a subsequent test of memory. The authors established in their second study that when guided retrieval practice and final recall tests were separated by 24 hr, retrieval-induced forgetting failed to emerge and misinformation effects were absent. In contrast, a delay of 24 hr between initial encoding and guided retrieval practice produced not only retrieval-induced forgetting but also misinformation effects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-142
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2002

Keywords

  • MISLEADING POSTEVENT INFORMATION
  • EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY
  • RECALL
  • INTERFERENCE
  • INTEGRATION
  • IMPAIRMENT
  • CHARM

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'New evidence on the suggestibility of memory: The role of retrieval-induced forgetting in misinformation effects.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this