Moral Obligation, Blame and Self-Governance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper shows how moral concepts are definable in terms of reasons for the blame sentiment. It then shows how, given that definition, the categoricity of moral obligation follows from some plausible principles about reasons for blame. The nature of moral agency is further considered in this light. In particular, in what sense is it self-governing agency? Self-governing actors must be at least self-determining: that is, they must be able to think about what reasons they have, in order in order to assess what they have sufficient reason to believe, feel, or do. Thus any moral assessment implies that the person assessed is capable of self-governance in that sense. Furthermore, this notion of self-governance implies that an agent's moral obligations are relative to the agent's warranted beliefs. However it does not entail that moral agents must be autonomous, in the strong sense intended by Kant. Some consequences for modern conceptions of morality are considered.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)158 - 180
JournalSocial Philosophy and Policy
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Moral Obligation, Blame and Self-Governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this