Monitoring plastic beach litter by number or by weight: the implications of fragmentation

Lauren Smith, William Richard Turrell*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Eighty surveys of ten Scottish beaches recorded litter sizes and weights. A simple model of fragmentation explains the distribution of plastic beach litter weights, producing a logarithmic cascade in weight-frequencies having a power law exponent of 1.6. Implications of fragmentation are numerous. Heavy litter is rare, light fragments are common. Monitoring by number is sensitive to minimum observable fragment size, age of the litter, and energy of the foreshore. Mean litter item weights should be used to calculate beach plastic loadings. Presence/absence of mega litter can distort monitoring by weight. Multiple surveys are needed to estimate mega litter statistics. Monitoring by weight can change the perception of the importance of litter sources (e.g., in our surveys, contribution from fishing was 6% by number, 41% by weight). In order to introduce consistency between beach surveys using visual methods by number, a standard minimum plastic fragment size should be introduced.

Original languageEnglish
Article number702570
Number of pages14
JournalFrontiers in Marine Science
Volume8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Sept 2021

Keywords

  • Beach litter
  • Fragmentation
  • Litter sizes
  • Litter weights
  • Marine plastics
  • Monitoring

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Monitoring plastic beach litter by number or by weight: the implications of fragmentation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this