Abstract
We compare two methods of motivating money in New Keynesian dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models-money-in-the-utility function and the cash-in-advance (CIA) constraint-as well as two ways of modelling monetary policy: the interest rate feedback rule and money growth rules. As an aid to model selection, we use a new econometric measure of the distance between model and data variance-covariance matrices. The proposed measure is useful in distinguishing between alternative general equilibrium models. Drawing on our econometric analysis, we argue that the CIA model, closed by a money growth rule, comes closest to the data.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 88-122 |
Number of pages | 35 |
Journal | Manchester School |
Volume | 75 |
Issue number | S1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2007 |
Keywords
- SAMPLE COVARIANCE-MATRIX
- BUSINESS-CYCLE MODELS
- STATISTICAL-INFERENCE
- CALIBRATED MODELS
- STICKY PRICES
- DISTRIBUTIONS
- EIGENVALUES
- PERSISTENCE
- FRAMEWORK