TY - JOUR
T1 - Molecular tools for bathing water assessment in Europe
T2 - balancing social science research with a rapidly developing environmental science evidence-base
AU - Oliver, D.M.
AU - Hanley, Nicholas David
AU - van Niekerk, M.
AU - Kay, D.
AU - Heathwaite, A.L.
AU - Rabinovici, S.J.M.
AU - Kinzelman, J.L.
AU - Fleming, L.E.
AU - Porter, J.
AU - Shaikh, S.
AU - Fish, R.
AU - Chilton, S.
AU - Hewitt, J.
AU - Connolly, E.
AU - Cummins, A.
AU - Glenk, K.
AU - McPhail, C.
AU - McRory, E.
AU - McVittie, A.
AU - Giles, A.
AU - Roberts, S.
AU - Simpson, K.
AU - Tinch, D.
AU - Thairs, T.
AU - Avery, L.M.
AU - Vinten, A.J.A.
AU - Watts, B.D.
AU - Quilliam, R.S.
N1 - The Working Group and associated workshop series were funded by the Natural Environment Research Council as part of the Delivering Healthy Water project (NE/I022191/1). LF received funding in part by the European Regional Development Fund Programme and the European Social Fund Convergence Programme
for Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly
PY - 2015/9/21
Y1 - 2015/9/21
N2 - The use of molecular tools, principally qPCR, versus traditional culture-based methods for quantifying microbial parameters (e.g., Fecal Indicator Organisms) in bathing waters generates considerable ongoing debate at the science–policy interface. Advances in science have allowed the development and application of molecular biological methods for rapid (~2 h) quantification of microbial pollution in bathing and recreational waters. In contrast, culture-based methods can take between 18 and 96 h for sample processing. Thus, molecular tools offer an opportunity to provide a more meaningful statement of microbial risk to water-users by providing near-real-time information enabling potentially more informed decision-making with regard to water-based activities. However, complementary studies concerning the potential costs and benefits of adopting rapid methods as a regulatory tool are in short supply. We report on findings from an international Working Group that examined the breadth of social impacts, challenges, and research opportunities associated with the application of molecular tools to bathing water regulations.
AB - The use of molecular tools, principally qPCR, versus traditional culture-based methods for quantifying microbial parameters (e.g., Fecal Indicator Organisms) in bathing waters generates considerable ongoing debate at the science–policy interface. Advances in science have allowed the development and application of molecular biological methods for rapid (~2 h) quantification of microbial pollution in bathing and recreational waters. In contrast, culture-based methods can take between 18 and 96 h for sample processing. Thus, molecular tools offer an opportunity to provide a more meaningful statement of microbial risk to water-users by providing near-real-time information enabling potentially more informed decision-making with regard to water-based activities. However, complementary studies concerning the potential costs and benefits of adopting rapid methods as a regulatory tool are in short supply. We report on findings from an international Working Group that examined the breadth of social impacts, challenges, and research opportunities associated with the application of molecular tools to bathing water regulations.
KW - Bathing Water Directive
KW - Fecal indicator organism
KW - Microbial pollution
KW - Public perception
KW - Recreational water quality
KW - Risk communication
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84954375580
U2 - 10.1007/s13280-015-0698-9
DO - 10.1007/s13280-015-0698-9
M3 - Article
SN - 0044-7447
JO - Ambio
JF - Ambio
ER -