TY - JOUR
T1 - Modal models for Bradwardine's theory of truth
AU - Restall, Greg
N1 - Funding Information:
5. Acknowledgements. Thanks to Allen Hazen and to audiences at the University of Melbourne and at the Mathematical Methods in Philosophy Conference in Banff for discussion. I am most grateful to Stephen Read for sustained correspondence on these issues. Thanks too to an anonymous referee for helpful comments that improved the presentation of these results. This research is supported by the Australian Research Council, through grant DP0343388 and Cat Empire, through their album Two Shoes.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2008 Association for Symbolic Logic.
PY - 2008/8/1
Y1 - 2008/8/1
N2 - Stephen Read (2002, 2006) has recently discussed Bradwardine's theory of truth and defended it as an appropriate way to treat paradoxes such as the liar. In this paper, I discuss Read's formalisation of Bradwardine's theory of truth and provide a class of models for this theory. The models facilitate comparison of Bradwardine's theory with contemporary theories of truth.
AB - Stephen Read (2002, 2006) has recently discussed Bradwardine's theory of truth and defended it as an appropriate way to treat paradoxes such as the liar. In this paper, I discuss Read's formalisation of Bradwardine's theory of truth and provide a class of models for this theory. The models facilitate comparison of Bradwardine's theory with contemporary theories of truth.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989213464&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S1755020308080180
DO - 10.1017/S1755020308080180
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84989213464
SN - 1755-0203
VL - 1
SP - 225
EP - 240
JO - Review of Symbolic Logic
JF - Review of Symbolic Logic
IS - 2
ER -