Mobile Networks: Naming vs. Tunnelling

Devan Rehunathan; Saleem Bhatti

Mobile Networks: Naming vs. Tunnelling

School of Computer Science

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

Using data of passenger numbers and train schedules from the London Underground metropolitan railway system, we compare a Tunnelling-based to a Naming-based approach for supporting mobile networks. We show that, in terms of packet overhead, a naming based approach may have similar performance overhead to a tunnelling approach, and so may offer a viable alternative, whilst also offering other benefits.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	IEEE INFOCOM 2009 - IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS WORKSHOPS
Place of Publication	NEW YORK
Publisher	IEEE
Pages	369-370
Number of pages	2
ISBN (Print)	978-1-4244-3968-3
Publication status	Published - 2009

Cite this

@inproceedings{65c801289286402e95fd1d05b05e7478,

title = "Mobile Networks: Naming vs. Tunnelling",

abstract = "Using data of passenger numbers and train schedules from the London Underground metropolitan railway system, we compare a Tunnelling-based to a Naming-based approach for supporting mobile networks. We show that, in terms of packet overhead, a naming based approach may have similar performance overhead to a tunnelling approach, and so may offer a viable alternative, whilst also offering other benefits.",

author = "Devan Rehunathan and Saleem Bhatti",

year = "2009",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-1-4244-3968-3",

pages = "369--370",

booktitle = "IEEE INFOCOM 2009 - IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS WORKSHOPS",

publisher = "IEEE",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Mobile Networks: Naming vs. Tunnelling

AU - Rehunathan, Devan

AU - Bhatti, Saleem

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Using data of passenger numbers and train schedules from the London Underground metropolitan railway system, we compare a Tunnelling-based to a Naming-based approach for supporting mobile networks. We show that, in terms of packet overhead, a naming based approach may have similar performance overhead to a tunnelling approach, and so may offer a viable alternative, whilst also offering other benefits.

AB - Using data of passenger numbers and train schedules from the London Underground metropolitan railway system, we compare a Tunnelling-based to a Naming-based approach for supporting mobile networks. We show that, in terms of packet overhead, a naming based approach may have similar performance overhead to a tunnelling approach, and so may offer a viable alternative, whilst also offering other benefits.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/70349673946

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-1-4244-3968-3

SP - 369

EP - 370

BT - IEEE INFOCOM 2009 - IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS WORKSHOPS

PB - IEEE

CY - NEW YORK

ER -

Mobile Networks: Naming vs. Tunnelling

Abstract

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this