Abstract
Using data of passenger numbers and train schedules from the London Underground metropolitan railway system, we compare a Tunnelling-based to a Naming-based approach for supporting mobile networks. We show that, in terms of packet overhead, a naming based approach may have similar performance overhead to a tunnelling approach, and so may offer a viable alternative, whilst also offering other benefits.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | IEEE INFOCOM 2009 - IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS WORKSHOPS |
| Place of Publication | NEW YORK |
| Publisher | IEEE |
| Pages | 369-370 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-1-4244-3968-3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2009 |