Abstract
But exactly which are the non-paradoxical instances of (1)? Which instances can we endorse? Some are unproblematic: the grounded propositions pose no problem in Thanks to Otaávio Bueno, Mark Colyvan, Daniel Nolan, Graham Priest, Roy Sorensen and Achille Varzi and to the audience at the University of Otago for enjoyable discussions on this topic. Thanks to JC Beall and Brad Armour-Garb for their paper ‘‘Minimalism and the epistemic approach to paradox’’ [5], which raised many of the issues discussed here.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Deflationism and paradox |
| Editors | JC Beall, Bradley Armour-Garb |
| Place of Publication | Oxford |
| Publisher | British Academy (Oxford University Press) |
| Chapter | 7 |
| Pages | 97-106 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781383043358 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780199287116 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 31 Oct 2023 |
Keywords
- Bueno
- Exactly
- Paradoxical
- Propositions
- Unproblematic
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Minimalists about truth can (and should) be epistemicists, and it helps if they Are revision theorists too'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver