Migration and Health in England and Scotland: a Study of Migrant Selectivity and Salmon Bias

Matthew Wallace*, Hill Kulu

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    55 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This study examines the health of migrants between England and Scotland comparing their health patterns with those of origin and host populations. While there is a growing literature on the health and mortality of international migrants, few studies have investigated the health of people moving within a country. We use individual-level data from the UK 1991 population census and apply the technique of logistic regression to analyse health differences between migrants and non-migrants. The analysis of the prevalence of a limiting long-term illness shows that on average migrants have better health than non-migrants. Scottish migrants are origin country selective by health, whereas English migrants are host country selective by health. English men in older working ages show significant health advantages over both origin and host populations. No evidence was found to support a Salmon Bias. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)694-708
    Number of pages15
    JournalPopulation, Space and Place
    Volume20
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2014

    Keywords

    • health
    • migration
    • census analysis
    • logistic regression
    • Britain
    • LATINO MORTALITY PARADOX
    • LONG-TERM ILLNESS
    • LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS
    • HEART-DISEASE
    • FOLLOW-UP
    • IMMIGRANTS
    • WALES
    • ADVANTAGE
    • CENSUS
    • UK

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Migration and Health in England and Scotland: a Study of Migrant Selectivity and Salmon Bias'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this