Methodological Dilemmas: Gatekeepers and Positionality in Bradford

Gurchathen Singh Sanghera, S Thapar-Bjorkert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper explores the ever-evolving relationship between gatekeepers and the researcher, and the ways in which it may facilitate, constrain or transform the research process by opening and/or closing the gate. We explore the methodological issue of positionality and discuss the ways in which gatekeepers drew on different axes of the researcher's identities religion, ethnicity, gender and age - in ambiguous and contradictory ways. In analysing this relationship, we locate the discussion within its historical context, as we contend that contextuality influenced the way gatekeepers positioned the researcher. This paper draws on the field experiences of the first author in four inner-city neighbourhoods in Bradford, West Yorkshire, a northern city with a well-established Pakistani Muslim community that has become synonymous with the Rushdie affair and the 1995 and 2001 urban disturbances.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)543-562
Number of pages20
JournalEthnic and Racial Studies
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2008

Keywords

  • Bradford
  • Pakistani Muslims
  • gatekeepers
  • positionality
  • ethnic riots
  • ethnography
  • INSIDER
  • GENDER
  • PRAXIS
  • RIOTS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Methodological Dilemmas: Gatekeepers and Positionality in Bradford'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this