Meta-argumentation frameworks for multi-party dialogues

Gideon Ogunniye, Alice Toniolo, Nir Oren*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The conclusions drawn from a dialogue depend both on the content of the arguments, and the level of trust placed in the arguments and the entity advancing them. In this paper, we describe a framework for dialogue where such trust forms the basis for expressing preferences between arguments, and in turn, for computing conclusions of the dialogue. Our framework contains object and meta-level arguments, and uses ASPIC+ to represent arguments, while argument schemes capture meta-level arguments about trust and preferences.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPRIMA 2018: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems
Subtitle of host publication21st International Conference, Tokyo, Japan, October 29-November 2, 2018, Proceedings
EditorsTim Miller, Nir Oren, Yuko Sakurai, Itsuki Noda, Bastin Tony Savarimuthu, Tran Cao Son
Place of PublicationCham
PublisherSpringer
Pages585-593
Number of pages9
ISBN (Electronic)9783030030988
ISBN (Print)9783030030971
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Event21st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems, PRIMA 2018 - Tokyo, Japan
Duration: 29 Oct 20182 Nov 2018
Conference number: 21

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume11224 LNAI
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)1611-3349

Conference

Conference21st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems, PRIMA 2018
Abbreviated titlePRIMA 2018
Country/TerritoryJapan
CityTokyo
Period29/10/182/11/18

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Meta-argumentation frameworks for multi-party dialogues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this