Memorability of pre-designed and user-defined gesture sets

Miguel Nacenta; Yemliha Kamber; Yizhou Qiang; Per Ola Kristensson

doi:10.1145/2470654.2466142

Memorability of pre-designed and user-defined gesture sets

Miguel Nacenta, Yemliha Kamber, Yizhou Qiang, Per Ola Kristensson

School of Computer Science

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

We studied the memorability of free-form gesture sets for invoking actions. We compared three types of gesture sets: user-defined gesture sets, gesture sets designed by the authors, and random gesture sets in three studies with 33 participants in total. We found that user-defined gestures are easier to remember, both immediately after creation and on the next day (up to a 24% difference in recall rate compared to pre-designed gestures). We also discovered that the differences between gesture sets are mostly due to association errors (rather than gesture form errors), that participants prefer user-defined sets, and that they think user-defined gestures take less time to learn. Finally, we contribute a qualitative analysis of the tradeoffs involved in gesture type selection and share our data and a video corpus of 66 gestures
for replicability and further analysis.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2013)
Place of Publication	New York
Publisher	ACM
Pages	1099-1108
Number of pages	10
ISBN (Print)	9781450318990
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466142
Publication status	Published - 27 Apr 2013
Event	ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Paris, France Duration: 27 Apr 2013 → 2 May 2013

Conference

Conference	ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Country/Territory	France
City	Paris
Period	27/04/13 → 2/05/13

Keywords

Gesture sets
Gesture memorability
User-defined gestures
Gesture-based interfaces

Access to Document

10.1145/2470654.2466142

Data and analysis of gesture memorability study
This data is available to download freely without any restrictions. A citation to the original paper is requested if used in a publication. A quick note to the authors is appreciated if this data is used elsewhere.
Accepted author manuscript, 107 KB
NacentaKamberQiangKristensson-GestureMemorability
© ACM 2013. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive Version of Record was published in the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466142 The copy of record of the paper can be found in: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2470654.2466142
Accepted author manuscript, 1.02 MB

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@inproceedings{9fb6609a072446d88b3f29376cb9dc93,

title = "Memorability of pre-designed and user-defined gesture sets",

abstract = "We studied the memorability of free-form gesture sets for invoking actions. We compared three types of gesture sets: user-defined gesture sets, gesture sets designed by the authors, and random gesture sets in three studies with 33 participants in total. We found that user-defined gestures are easier to remember, both immediately after creation and on the next day (up to a 24\% difference in recall rate compared to pre-designed gestures). We also discovered that the differences between gesture sets are mostly due to association errors (rather than gesture form errors), that participants prefer user-defined sets, and that they think user-defined gestures take less time to learn. Finally, we contribute a qualitative analysis of the tradeoffs involved in gesture type selection and share our data and a video corpus of 66 gestures for replicability and further analysis. ",

keywords = "Gesture sets, Gesture memorability, User-defined gestures, Gesture-based interfaces",

author = "Miguel Nacenta and Yemliha Kamber and Yizhou Qiang and Kristensson, \{Per Ola\}",

year = "2013",

month = apr,

day = "27",

doi = "10.1145/2470654.2466142",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781450318990",

pages = "1099--1108",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2013)",

publisher = "ACM",

address = "United States",

note = "ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ; Conference date: 27-04-2013 Through 02-05-2013",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Memorability of pre-designed and user-defined gesture sets

AU - Nacenta, Miguel

AU - Kamber, Yemliha

AU - Qiang, Yizhou

AU - Kristensson, Per Ola

PY - 2013/4/27

Y1 - 2013/4/27

N2 - We studied the memorability of free-form gesture sets for invoking actions. We compared three types of gesture sets: user-defined gesture sets, gesture sets designed by the authors, and random gesture sets in three studies with 33 participants in total. We found that user-defined gestures are easier to remember, both immediately after creation and on the next day (up to a 24% difference in recall rate compared to pre-designed gestures). We also discovered that the differences between gesture sets are mostly due to association errors (rather than gesture form errors), that participants prefer user-defined sets, and that they think user-defined gestures take less time to learn. Finally, we contribute a qualitative analysis of the tradeoffs involved in gesture type selection and share our data and a video corpus of 66 gestures for replicability and further analysis.

AB - We studied the memorability of free-form gesture sets for invoking actions. We compared three types of gesture sets: user-defined gesture sets, gesture sets designed by the authors, and random gesture sets in three studies with 33 participants in total. We found that user-defined gestures are easier to remember, both immediately after creation and on the next day (up to a 24% difference in recall rate compared to pre-designed gestures). We also discovered that the differences between gesture sets are mostly due to association errors (rather than gesture form errors), that participants prefer user-defined sets, and that they think user-defined gestures take less time to learn. Finally, we contribute a qualitative analysis of the tradeoffs involved in gesture type selection and share our data and a video corpus of 66 gestures for replicability and further analysis.

KW - Gesture sets

KW - Gesture memorability

KW - User-defined gestures

KW - Gesture-based interfaces

UR - http://nacenta.com

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84877987683

U2 - 10.1145/2470654.2466142

DO - 10.1145/2470654.2466142

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781450318990

SP - 1099

EP - 1108

BT - Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2013)

PB - ACM

CY - New York

T2 - ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Y2 - 27 April 2013 through 2 May 2013

ER -

Memorability of pre-designed and user-defined gesture sets

Abstract

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Handle.net

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Text Entry By Inference: Eye Typing, Ste: Text Entry by Inference: Eye Typing, Stenography, and Understanding Context of Use

Cite this

Memorability of pre-designed and user-defined gesture sets

Abstract

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Handle.net

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Projects

Text Entry By Inference: Eye Typing, Ste: Text Entry by Inference: Eye Typing, Stenography, and Understanding Context of Use

Cite this