Abstract
Recent critiques of moral psychology and the contemporary culture wars highlight the need for a better understanding of diverse moral perspectives. A model of moral motives is proposed. The fundamental approach-avoidance distinction in motivation is crossed with self-other focus to create four moral motives: Self-Restraint (avoidance-self), Social Order (avoidance-other), Self-Reliance (approach-self), and Social Justice (approach-other). Three studies explored these motives in the context of political orientation. Overall, political conservatism was associated with avoidance motives and liberalism with approach motives. Approach-avoidance motives were also associated with distinct patterns of results regarding authoritarianism, social dominance, and positions on contemporary social issues. Responses of campus political groups demonstrated the utility of the moral motives in providing a more nuanced view of politics that also takes into account the model's second dimension, for an emphasis on Self focus (personality responsibility) versus Other focus (social responsibility) further distinguished between conservative groups. Moral and political implications are discussed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1091-1099 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Journal of Experimental Social Psychology |
Volume | 44 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 8 Dec 2007 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2008 |
Keywords
- Moral psychology
- Contemporary culture
- Moral motives
- Self restraint
- Social order
- Self reliance
- Social justice
- Political orientation
- Political conservatism
- Political groups