TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term coexistence between the macroalga Caulerpa prolifera and the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa in a Mediterranean lagoon
AU - Belando, M.D.
AU - Bernardeau-Esteller, J.
AU - Paradinas, I.
AU - Ramos-Segura, A.
AU - García-Muñoz, R.
AU - García-Moreno, P.
AU - Marín-Guirao, L.
AU - Ruiz, J.M.
N1 - This work was supported by Projects G30072540 and FBCC2017 co-funded by the Spanish NGO Asociación de Naturalistas del Sureste and the Biodiversity Foundation of the Spanish Ministry of Ecological Transition and Demographic Challenge, and by Spanish Project UMBRAL (Responses of marine benthic macrophytes to stress: critical transitions, resilience and management opportunities) financed by the National Plan of Research of the Spanish Government (CTM2017-86695-C3-2-R). The work was also supported by the DMEMM project financed by the Spanish Oceanography Institute. M.B.D. and J.B.E were supported by a contract within the program Personal Técnico de Apoyo funded by the Ministry of Science and Innovation.
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - The potential negative influence of the seaweed Caulerpa prolifera on the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa was explored in a Mediterranean coastal lagoon (Mar Menor, Spain) where the alga suddenly and rapidly spread four decades ago. An extensive field sampling was carried out across the lagoon to characterise the distribution and abundance of both macrophytes at different spatial scales, as well as sediment characteristics. Generalised linear and additive models were performed at the whole-lagoon scale, for deep and shallow bottoms, independently, to explore factors influencing C. nodosa distribution and abundance. A high-spatial-resolution macrophyte distribution map was also generated by integrating underwater imaging, direct visualisations and orthophotographs. This map showed that both macrophytes largely dominated the ecosystem but with opposing depth patterns of abundance that mainly reflected their specific light requirements. C. nodosa was dominant at shallow depths but also grew intermingled with a dense C. prolifera bed over large areas of the deep seafloor with highly anoxic muddy sediments. Models did not reveal overall negative relationships between the macrophytes, indicating that C. prolifera was not the main driver of C. nodosa distribution and abundance in this coastal lagoon. Findings highlighted the absence of a negative direct or indirect influence of C. prolifera on C. nodosa, as supported by the fact that the distributions of both macrophytes were similar to those reported in the 1980s, just a few years after C. prolifera had spread in the lagoon. We conclude, therefore, that C. prolifera is not progressively replacing C. nodosa in this ecosystem, where both species have coexisted for decades.
AB - The potential negative influence of the seaweed Caulerpa prolifera on the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa was explored in a Mediterranean coastal lagoon (Mar Menor, Spain) where the alga suddenly and rapidly spread four decades ago. An extensive field sampling was carried out across the lagoon to characterise the distribution and abundance of both macrophytes at different spatial scales, as well as sediment characteristics. Generalised linear and additive models were performed at the whole-lagoon scale, for deep and shallow bottoms, independently, to explore factors influencing C. nodosa distribution and abundance. A high-spatial-resolution macrophyte distribution map was also generated by integrating underwater imaging, direct visualisations and orthophotographs. This map showed that both macrophytes largely dominated the ecosystem but with opposing depth patterns of abundance that mainly reflected their specific light requirements. C. nodosa was dominant at shallow depths but also grew intermingled with a dense C. prolifera bed over large areas of the deep seafloor with highly anoxic muddy sediments. Models did not reveal overall negative relationships between the macrophytes, indicating that C. prolifera was not the main driver of C. nodosa distribution and abundance in this coastal lagoon. Findings highlighted the absence of a negative direct or indirect influence of C. prolifera on C. nodosa, as supported by the fact that the distributions of both macrophytes were similar to those reported in the 1980s, just a few years after C. prolifera had spread in the lagoon. We conclude, therefore, that C. prolifera is not progressively replacing C. nodosa in this ecosystem, where both species have coexisted for decades.
KW - Seagrass-seaweed interactions
KW - Macrophytes mapping
KW - Mar Menor
KW - Coastal lagoon
U2 - 10.1016/j.aquabot.2021.103415
DO - 10.1016/j.aquabot.2021.103415
M3 - Article
SN - 0304-3770
VL - 173
JO - Aquatic Botany
JF - Aquatic Botany
M1 - 103415
ER -