Logical consequence

Greg Restall; JC Beall; Gil Sagi

Logical consequence

Greg Restall, JC Beall, Gil Sagi

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Abstract

A good argument is one whose conclusions follow from its premises; its conclusions are consequences of its premises. But in what sense do conclusions follow from premises? What is it for a conclusion to be a consequence of premises? Those questions, in many respects, are at the heart of logic (as a philosophical discipline).

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Stanford encylopedia of philosophy
Editors	Edward N. Zalta, Uri Nodelman
Place of Publication	Stanford, CA
Publisher	Metaphysics Research Lab Stanford University
Publication status	Published - 17 May 2024

Publication series

Name	Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy
ISSN (Print)	1095-5054

Access to Document

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logical-consequence/Licence: Unspecified

Cite this

@inbook{497e307623534f6ba198e02cf7c62044,

title = "Logical consequence",

abstract = "A good argument is one whose conclusions follow from its premises; its conclusions are consequences of its premises. But in what sense do conclusions follow from premises? What is it for a conclusion to be a consequence of premises? Those questions, in many respects, are at the heart of logic (as a philosophical discipline).",

author = "Greg Restall and JC Beall and Gil Sagi",

year = "2024",

month = may,

day = "17",

language = "English",

series = "Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy",

publisher = "Metaphysics Research Lab Stanford University",

editor = "Zalta, \{Edward N.\} and Uri Nodelman",

booktitle = "Stanford encylopedia of philosophy",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Logical consequence

AU - Restall, Greg

AU - Beall, JC

AU - Sagi, Gil

PY - 2024/5/17

Y1 - 2024/5/17

N2 - A good argument is one whose conclusions follow from its premises; its conclusions are consequences of its premises. But in what sense do conclusions follow from premises? What is it for a conclusion to be a consequence of premises? Those questions, in many respects, are at the heart of logic (as a philosophical discipline).

AB - A good argument is one whose conclusions follow from its premises; its conclusions are consequences of its premises. But in what sense do conclusions follow from premises? What is it for a conclusion to be a consequence of premises? Those questions, in many respects, are at the heart of logic (as a philosophical discipline).

UR - https://plato.stanford.edu/index.html

UR - https://discover.libraryhub.jisc.ac.uk/search?isn=1095-5054&rn=1

M3 - Chapter

T3 - Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy

BT - Stanford encylopedia of philosophy

A2 - Zalta, Edward N.

A2 - Nodelman, Uri

PB - Metaphysics Research Lab Stanford University

CY - Stanford, CA

ER -

Logical consequence

Abstract

Publication series

Access to Document

Other files and links

Substructural logics

Cite this