Locality deprivation and Type 2 diabetes incidence: A local test of relative inequalities

Matthew Cox, Paul J. Boyle, Peter G. Davey, Zhiqiang Feng, Andrew D. Morris

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    72 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    There is increasing evidence that the socio-spatial context of the local area in which one lives can have an effect on health, but teasing out contextual influences is not a simple task. We examine whether the incidence of Type 2 diabetes in small areas in Tayside, Scotland is associated with deprivation in neighbouring areas, controlling for the deprivation of the area itself. As such, this is a genuinely 'contextual' variable situating each small area in the context of surrounding places. We test two opposing hypotheses. First, a 'psycho-social' hypothesis might suggest that negative social comparisons made by individuals in relation to those who surround them could lead to chronic low-level stress via psycho-social pathways, the physiological effects of which could promote diabetes. Thus, we would expect people living in deprived areas surrounded by less deprived areas to have an increased risk of diabetes, compared to those living in similarly deprived areas that are surrounded by equally or more deprived areas. Alternatively, a neo-materialist approach might suggest that the social, cultural and environmental resources in the surrounding environment will influence circumstances in a particular area of interest. Poorer areas surrounded by less deprived areas would benefit from the better resources in the wider locality, while less deprived areas surrounded by poorer areas may be hampered by the poorer resources available nearby. We refer to this as the 'Pull-up/pull-down' hypothesis. Our results show that, as expected, area deprivation is positively related to diabetes incidence (p < 0.001), whilst deprivation inequality between areas and their neighbours is negatively related (p = 0.006). Type 2 diabetes is more common in deprived areas, but lower in deprived areas that are surrounded by relatively less deprived areas. On the other hand, less deprived areas that are surrounded by relatively more deprived areas have higher diabetes incidence than would be expected from the deprivation of the area alone. Our model results are consistent with a pull-up/pull-down model and tend no support to a 'psycho-social' interpretation at this local scale of analysis. (C) 2007 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1953-1964
    Number of pages12
    JournalSocial Science and Medicine
    Volume65
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2007

    Keywords

    • type 2 diabetes
    • deprivation
    • relative inequality
    • pull-up/pull-down hypothesis
    • psycho-social hypothesis
    • Scotland
    • UK
    • SUBJECTIVE SOCIAL-STATUS
    • VS. PSYCHOSOCIAL EXPLANATIONS
    • SCOTTISH MEN 61(9)
    • SELF-RATED HEALTH
    • MACLEOD ET-AL.
    • INCOME INEQUALITY
    • UNITED-STATES
    • IMPORTANT DETERMINANT
    • SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS
    • METROPOLITAN-AREAS

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Locality deprivation and Type 2 diabetes incidence: A local test of relative inequalities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this