Linguistic reflection in Java: a quantitative assessment

Graham Njal Cameron Kirby; Ronald Morrison; D Stemple; AL Brown; CJ Barter

Linguistic reflection in Java: a quantitative assessment

Graham Njal Cameron Kirby, Ronald Morrison, D Stemple, AL Brown (Editor), CJ Barter (Editor)

School of Computer Science

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

Linguistic reflection allows a running program to generate new program fragments and to integrate these into its own execution. The advantages of the technique include attaining high levels of genericity and accommodating system evolution. Here its use to provide generic programs in Java is compared for a particular example, natural join, against alternative implementation approaches.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	5th International IDEA (Integrated Data Environments Australia) Workshop
Editors	F Brown
Pages	74-79
Publication status	Published - 1998
Event	5th International IDEA Workshop - Fremantle, Australia Duration: 7 Feb 1998 → …

Conference

Conference	5th International IDEA Workshop
Country/Territory	Australia
City	Fremantle
Period	7/02/98 → …

Access to Document

Linguistic ReflectionAccepted author manuscript, 24.8 KB

Cite this

@inproceedings{61cee3c8395a4e74a8d5c4de85aac46a,

title = "Linguistic reflection in Java: a quantitative assessment",

abstract = "Linguistic reflection allows a running program to generate new program fragments and to integrate these into its own execution. The advantages of the technique include attaining high levels of genericity and accommodating system evolution. Here its use to provide generic programs in Java is compared for a particular example, natural join, against alternative implementation approaches.",

author = "Kirby, {Graham Njal Cameron} and Ronald Morrison and D Stemple and AL Brown and CJ Barter",

year = "1998",

language = "English",

pages = "74--79",

editor = "F Brown",

booktitle = "5th International IDEA (Integrated Data Environments Australia) Workshop",

note = "5th International IDEA Workshop ; Conference date: 07-02-1998",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Linguistic reflection in Java

T2 - 5th International IDEA Workshop

AU - Kirby, Graham Njal Cameron

AU - Morrison, Ronald

AU - Stemple, D

A2 - Brown, AL

A2 - Barter, CJ

A2 - Brown, F

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Linguistic reflection allows a running program to generate new program fragments and to integrate these into its own execution. The advantages of the technique include attaining high levels of genericity and accommodating system evolution. Here its use to provide generic programs in Java is compared for a particular example, natural join, against alternative implementation approaches.

AB - Linguistic reflection allows a running program to generate new program fragments and to integrate these into its own execution. The advantages of the technique include attaining high levels of genericity and accommodating system evolution. Here its use to provide generic programs in Java is compared for a particular example, natural join, against alternative implementation approaches.

UR - http://cs.adelaide.edu.au/users/idea/idea5/

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 74

EP - 79

BT - 5th International IDEA (Integrated Data Environments Australia) Workshop

Y2 - 7 February 1998

ER -

Linguistic reflection in Java: a quantitative assessment

Abstract

Conference

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this