Legal contestation of artificial intelligence-related decision-making in the United Kingdom: reflections for policy

Archie Drake, Perry Keller, Irene Pietropaoli, Anuj Puri, Spyros Maniatis, Joe Tomlinson, Jack Maxwell, Pete Fussey, Claudia Pagliari, Hannah Smethurst, Lilian Edwards, Sir William Blair

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    This paper considers legal contestation in the UK as a source of useful reflections for AI policy. The government has published a 'National AI Strategy', but it is unclear how effective this will be given doubts about levels of public trust. One key concern is the UK's apparent ?side-lining? of the law. A series of events were convened to investigate critical legal perspectives on the issues, culminating in an expert workshop addressing five sectors. Participants discussed AI in the context of wider trends towards automated decision-making (ADM). A recent proliferation in legal actions is expected to continue. The discussions illuminated the various ways in which individual examples connect systematically to developments in governance and broader 'AI-related decision-making', particularly due to chronic problems with transparency and awareness. This provides a fresh and current insight into the perspectives of key groups advancing criticisms relevant to policy in this area. Policymakers? neglect of the law and legal processes is contributing to quality issues with recent practical ADM implementation in the UK. Strong signals are now required to switch back from the vicious cycle of increasing mistrust to an approach capable of generating public trust. Suggestions are summarised for consideration by policymakers.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages35
    JournalInternational Review of Law, Computers & Technology
    VolumeLatest Articles
    Early online date24 Nov 2021
    Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24 Nov 2021


    • Decision-making
    • Public policy
    • Artificial intelligence


    Dive into the research topics of 'Legal contestation of artificial intelligence-related decision-making in the United Kingdom: reflections for policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this