Learning in, about and from the field? Symbolic functions of EU knowledge production on Central Asia

Karolina Kluczewska*, Oleg Korneev

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


Examining the European Union’s (EU) engagement with Central Asia since the early 1990s, we see an increased commitment to context sensitivity. Arguably, in order to design ‘better’ interventions, the EU needs to know more about this region. This article explores three means of EU learning: in the field – through EU officials’ first-hand experience of working at EU Delegations in Central Asia; about the field – through programmed channels of external expert knowledge, and in particular think tanks; and from the field – during institutionalized consultations with multiple local actors, such as academics, journalists and non-governmental organizations. It is argued that despite this complex learning infrastructure, EU knowledge production on Central Asia has a predominantly performative character. Rather than leading to changes in its relations with Central Asia, new knowledge produced by the EU aims at legitimizing this organization’s pre-existing frameworks of engagement and practices of interactions with the region, and substantiating existing policy priorities.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages21
JournalCentral Asian Survey
VolumeLatest Articles
Early online date5 Sept 2022
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 5 Sept 2022


  • European Union
  • Knowledge production
  • Learning
  • Legitimation
  • Local turn
  • Practice turn


Dive into the research topics of 'Learning in, about and from the field? Symbolic functions of EU knowledge production on Central Asia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this