Abstract
This paper gives an account of Kant’s concept of self-contentment [Selbstzufriedenheit], i.e. the satisfaction involved in the performance of moral action. This concept is vulnerable to an important objection: if moral action is satisfying, it might only ever be performed for the sake of this satisfaction. I explain Kant’s response to this objection and argue that it is superior to Francis Hutcheson’s response to a similar objection. I conclude by showing that two other notions of moral satisfaction in Kant’s moral philosophy, namely ‘sweet merit’ and the highest good, also avoid the objection.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 281-303 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Kantian Review |
Volume | 22 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 5 May 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2017 |
Keywords
- Self-contentment
- Garve
- Hutcheson
- Eudaimonism
- Pleasure
- Happiness
- Moral motivation