Investigation and management of prosthetic joint infection in knee replacement: a BASK surgical practice guideline

N Kalson*, J A Mathews, A Alvand, R Morgan-Jones, N Jenkins, JRA Phillips, AD Toms, PN Baker, D Barrett, BV Bloch, R Carrington, K Eyres, A Gambhir, P Hopgood, N Howells, WF Jackson, P James, L Jeys, R Kerry, J MilesB Mockford, J Murray, G Pavlou, A Porteous, A Price, M Sarungi, R Spencer-Jones, Phillip Jonathan Walmsley, B Waterson, JP Whittaker

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The burden of knee replacement prosthetic joint infection (KR PJI) is increasing. KR PJI is difficult to treat, outcomes can be poor and it is financially expensive and limited evidence is available to guide treatment decisions.

Aim: To provide guidelines for surgeons and units treating KR PJI.

Methods: Guideline formation by consensus process undertaken by BASK's Revision Knee Working Group, supported by outputs from UK-PJI meetings.

Results: Improved outcomes should be achieved through provision of care by revision centres in a network model. Treatment of KR PJI should only be undertaken at specialist units with the required infrastructure and a regular infection MDT. This document outlines practice guidelines for units providing a KR PJI service and sets out: CONCLUSIONS: KR PJI patients treated within the NHS should be provided the best care possible. This report sets out guidance and support for surgeons and units to achieve this.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1857-1865
JournalThe Knee
Volume27
Issue number6
Early online date14 Nov 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020

Keywords

  • Arthroplasty
  • Knee
  • Revision
  • Infection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Investigation and management of prosthetic joint infection in knee replacement: a BASK surgical practice guideline'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this