Introduction: historicized intermediality and historical variations on intermediality

Ian Richard Johnson

doi:10.1093/fmls/cqab002

Introduction: historicized intermediality and historical variations on intermediality

Ian Richard Johnson^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Different disciplines ‘do’ intermediality through their own specific take on what media are and how they work. Intermedial research has certainly thriven in recent decades, but it has done so in a creatively disorganized fashion, with considerable inconsistencies in its underpinning premises, in its philosophical methods and in its use of terminology.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	40-59
Number of pages	20
Journal	Forum for Modern Language Studies
Volume	57
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/fmls/cqab002
Publication status	Published - 1 Mar 2021

Access to Document

10.1093/fmls/cqab002

Cite this

@article{28eb62b454e04b2387884fc22aa3e1d0,

title = "Introduction: historicized intermediality and historical variations on intermediality",

abstract = "Different disciplines {\textquoteleft}do{\textquoteright} intermediality through their own specific take on what media are and how they work. Intermedial research has certainly thriven in recent decades, but it has done so in a creatively disorganized fashion, with considerable inconsistencies in its underpinning premises, in its philosophical methods and in its use of terminology.",

author = "Johnson, \{Ian Richard\}",

year = "2021",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1093/fmls/cqab002",

language = "English",

volume = "57",

pages = "40--59",

journal = "Forum for Modern Language Studies",

issn = "0015-8518",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introduction

T2 - historicized intermediality and historical variations on intermediality

AU - Johnson, Ian Richard

PY - 2021/3/1

Y1 - 2021/3/1

N2 - Different disciplines ‘do’ intermediality through their own specific take on what media are and how they work. Intermedial research has certainly thriven in recent decades, but it has done so in a creatively disorganized fashion, with considerable inconsistencies in its underpinning premises, in its philosophical methods and in its use of terminology.

AB - Different disciplines ‘do’ intermediality through their own specific take on what media are and how they work. Intermedial research has certainly thriven in recent decades, but it has done so in a creatively disorganized fashion, with considerable inconsistencies in its underpinning premises, in its philosophical methods and in its use of terminology.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85108146998

U2 - 10.1093/fmls/cqab002

DO - 10.1093/fmls/cqab002

M3 - Article

SN - 0015-8518

VL - 57

SP - 40

EP - 59

JO - Forum for Modern Language Studies

JF - Forum for Modern Language Studies

IS - 1

ER -

Introduction: historicized intermediality and historical variations on intermediality

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Talking point: a forum for opening critical debate: historicizing intermediality and multimediality: cases from the late Middle Ages and early modernity

Cite this