Introduction: Discussing modularity

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This debate provides a critical view of the state of the art of the notion modularity as applied to the understanding of cognitive development. The leading article by Enesco and Delval suggests that the notion of modularity as an alternative to constructivism has failed in developmental psychology. Constructivism would be better supported by current data in developmental psychology and neuroscience. Commentaries by Nunez, Scerif, and Gomila elaborate or refine these conclusions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)245-248
Number of pages4
JournalInfancia y Aprendizaje: Journal for the Study of Education and Development
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2006

Keywords

  • modularity
  • nativism
  • domain specificity
  • constructivism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Introduction: Discussing modularity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this