Abstract
This paper models inter-jurisdiction competition for foreign direct investment and optimal government policy intervention to protect the national interest. The inter-jurisdiction competition for a multinational has the potential of favouring the multinational and of becoming detrimental for the host country. The central government wants to limit such competition but it cannot tax-discriminate between different types of multinationals. We find that the central government would use tax policy to create asymmetries even when the underlying structure is symmetrical. This offers a novel explanation for the creation of 'Special Economic Zones' in many countries, which are well known to be aimed at the attraction of foreign direct investment. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 688-702 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Regional Science and Urban Economics |
| Volume | 37 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2007 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- bargaining
- subsidy
- regional
- competition
- foreign direct investment (FDI)
- TAX
- INVESTMENT
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Inter-jurisdiction subsidy competition for a new production plant: What is the central government optimal policy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver