Inference of ecological and social drivers of human brain-size evolution

Mauricio Gonzalez Forero, Andy Gardner

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

52 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The human brain is unusually large. It has tripled in size from Australopithecines to modern humans1 and has become almost six times larger than expected for a placental mammal of human size2. Brains incur high metabolic costs3 and accordingly a long-standing question is why the large human brain has evolved4. The leading hypotheses propose benefits of improved cognition for overcoming ecological5,6,7, social8,9,10 or cultural11,12,13,14 challenges. However, these hypotheses are typically assessed using correlative analyses, and establishing causes for brain-size evolution remains difficult15,16. Here we introduce a metabolic approach that enables causal assessment of social hypotheses for brain-size evolution. Our approach yields quantitative predictions for brain and body size from formalized social hypotheses given empirical estimates of the metabolic costs of the brain. Our model predicts the evolution of adult Homo sapiens-sized brains and bodies when individuals face a combination of 60% ecological, 30% cooperative and 10% between-group competitive challenges, and suggests that between-individual competition has been unimportant for driving human brain-size evolution. Moreover, our model indicates that brain expansion in Homo was driven by ecological rather than social challenges, and was perhaps strongly promoted by culture. Our metabolic approach thus enables causal assessments that refine, refute and unify hypotheses of brain-size evolution.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)554-557
JournalNature
Volume557
Issue number7706
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 May 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Inference of ecological and social drivers of human brain-size evolution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this