Abstract
In this article, I consider how recent work on the philosophy of group-agency and shared-agency can help us to understand what it is for a church to act in worship. I argue that to assess a model’s suitability for providing such an account, we must consider how well it handles cases of non-paradigm participants, such as those with ASD and young infants. I suggest that whilst a shared-agency model helps to clarify how individuals coordinate actions in cases of reading or singing liturgy, it does not handle non-paradigm cases well and so cannot be considered a suitable model of group liturgical action. Instead, I suggest that a model of group-agency, in which a plurality of action types can contribute to the actions of a group as a whole, is better suited to explaining a church’s actions in worship.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 449-476 |
| Journal | Res Philosophica |
| Volume | 95 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2018 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Inclusive worship and group liturgical action'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver