Improving peer-review by developing reviewers’ feedback literacy

Sin Wang Chong

doi:10.1002/leap.1378

Improving peer-review by developing reviewers’ feedback literacy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

There is a need to train journal peer reviewers to provide professional, constructive, and actionable feedback: i.e., develop their feedback literacy.Journals and publishers can improve the way they support peer reviewers' feedback literacy by raising awareness and providing guidance and exemplars of good practice.Existing online peer‐review training resources developed by major publishers only focus on content of feedback but neglect the socio‐emotional aspect of feedback.Resources to develop peer reviewers' feedback literacy should be formulated by adopting knowledge‐based, skills‐based, and community‐based approaches.

Original language	English
Number of pages	7
Journal	Learned Publishing
Volume	34
Issue number	3
Early online date	23 Mar 2021
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1378
Publication status	Published - 5 Jul 2021

Access to Document

10.1002/leap.1378Licence: CC BY

Chong_2021_LP_ Improving-peer‐review_CC
Copyright © 2021 The Author. Learned Publishing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of ALPSP. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Final published version, 338 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{965bddb2a60e418f81ada4328c6aadb2,

title = "Improving peer-review by developing reviewers{\textquoteright} feedback literacy",

abstract = "There is a need to train journal peer reviewers to provide professional, constructive, and actionable feedback: i.e., develop their feedback literacy.Journals and publishers can improve the way they support peer reviewers' feedback literacy by raising awareness and providing guidance and exemplars of good practice.Existing online peer‐review training resources developed by major publishers only focus on content of feedback but neglect the socio‐emotional aspect of feedback.Resources to develop peer reviewers' feedback literacy should be formulated by adopting knowledge‐based, skills‐based, and community‐based approaches.",

author = "Chong, {Sin Wang}",

year = "2021",

month = jul,

day = "5",

doi = "10.1002/leap.1378",

language = "English",

volume = "34",

journal = "Learned Publishing",

issn = "0953-1513",

publisher = "Wiley Online Library",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving peer-review by developing reviewers’ feedback literacy

AU - Chong, Sin Wang

PY - 2021/7/5

Y1 - 2021/7/5

N2 - There is a need to train journal peer reviewers to provide professional, constructive, and actionable feedback: i.e., develop their feedback literacy.Journals and publishers can improve the way they support peer reviewers' feedback literacy by raising awareness and providing guidance and exemplars of good practice.Existing online peer‐review training resources developed by major publishers only focus on content of feedback but neglect the socio‐emotional aspect of feedback.Resources to develop peer reviewers' feedback literacy should be formulated by adopting knowledge‐based, skills‐based, and community‐based approaches.

AB - There is a need to train journal peer reviewers to provide professional, constructive, and actionable feedback: i.e., develop their feedback literacy.Journals and publishers can improve the way they support peer reviewers' feedback literacy by raising awareness and providing guidance and exemplars of good practice.Existing online peer‐review training resources developed by major publishers only focus on content of feedback but neglect the socio‐emotional aspect of feedback.Resources to develop peer reviewers' feedback literacy should be formulated by adopting knowledge‐based, skills‐based, and community‐based approaches.

U2 - 10.1002/leap.1378

DO - 10.1002/leap.1378

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 0953-1513

VL - 34

JO - Learned Publishing

JF - Learned Publishing

IS - 3

ER -

Improving peer-review by developing reviewers’ feedback literacy

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this