He who relies on his brother's property dies poor”: the complex narratives of livestock care in northern Tanzania

Alicia Davis*, Jennika Virhia, Joram Buza, John A. Crump, William A. de Glanville, Jo E. B. Halliday, Felix Lankester, Tauta Mappi, Kunda Mnzava, Emanuel S. Swai, Kate M. Thomas, Mamus Toima, Sarah Cleaveland, Blandina T. Mmbaga, Jo Sharp

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Background: Endemic zoonoses have important impacts for livestock-dependent households in East Africa. In these communities, people's health and livelihoods are severely affected by livestock disease losses. Understanding how livestock keepers undertake remedial actions for livestock illness has the potential for widespread benefits such as improving health interventions. Yet, studies about livestock and human health behaviours in the global south tend to focus on individual health choices. In reality, health behaviours are complex, and not solely about individualised health experiences. Rather, they are mediated by a range of “upstream” factors (such as unequal provision of services), which are beyond the control of the individual.

Methods: This paper presents qualitative research conducted from 2014 to 2019 for a study focused on the Social, Economic, and Environmental Drivers of Zoonoses in Tanzania (SEEDZ). Qualitative data were collected via focus group discussions, community meetings, informal interviews, formal in-depth interviews, observations and surveys that addressed issues of health, disease, zoonotic disease risks, and routes for treatment across 21 villages. Thematic analysis was carried out on in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. Conceptual analyses and observations were made through application of social science theories of health.

Findings: Livestock keepers undertake a range of health seeking strategies loosely categorised around self and formal treatment. Two key themes emerged that are central to why people make the decisions they do: access to resources and trust in health care providers. These two issues affect individual sense of agency which impacts their ability to act to improve livestock health outcomes. We suggest that individual choice and agency in veterinary health seeking decisions are only beneficial if health systems can offer adequate care and health equity is addressed.

Significance: This study demonstrates the value of in-depth qualitative research which reveals the nuance and complexity of people's decisions around livestock health. Most importantly, it explains why “better” knowledge does not always translate into “better” practise. The paper suggests that acknowledging and addressing these aspects of veterinary health seeking will lead to more effective provision.
Original languageEnglish
Article number749561
Number of pages18
JournalFrontiers in Veterinary Science
Publication statusPublished - 3 Nov 2021


  • Health seeking behaviours
  • One Health
  • Livestock health
  • KAP
  • East Africa


Dive into the research topics of '“He who relies on his brother's property dies poor”: the complex narratives of livestock care in northern Tanzania'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this