Identity and Indiscernibility

Katherine Jane Hawley

doi:10.1093/mind/fzn153

Identity and Indiscernibility

Katherine Jane Hawley

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Putative counterexamples to the Principle of Identity of Indiscernibles (PII) are notoriously inconclusive. I establish ground rules for debate in this area, offer a new response to such counterexamples for friends of the PII, but then argue that no response is entirely satisfactory. Finally, I undermine some positive arguments for PII.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	101-119
Number of pages	19
Journal	Mind
Volume	118
Issue number	469
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzn153
Publication status	Published - Jan 2009

Keywords

QUANTITATIVE PARSIMONY
NEUTRAL RELATIONS
PERSISTENCE
THISNESS
PARTS

Access to Document

10.1093/mind/fzn153

Cite this

@article{8c45b731370d4caf9163acc01f1c6937,

title = "Identity and Indiscernibility",

abstract = "Putative counterexamples to the Principle of Identity of Indiscernibles (PII) are notoriously inconclusive. I establish ground rules for debate in this area, offer a new response to such counterexamples for friends of the PII, but then argue that no response is entirely satisfactory. Finally, I undermine some positive arguments for PII.",

keywords = "QUANTITATIVE PARSIMONY, NEUTRAL RELATIONS, PERSISTENCE, THISNESS, PARTS",

author = "Hawley, \{Katherine Jane\}",

year = "2009",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1093/mind/fzn153",

language = "English",

volume = "118",

pages = "101--119",

journal = "Mind",

issn = "0026-4423",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "469",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identity and Indiscernibility

AU - Hawley, Katherine Jane

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - Putative counterexamples to the Principle of Identity of Indiscernibles (PII) are notoriously inconclusive. I establish ground rules for debate in this area, offer a new response to such counterexamples for friends of the PII, but then argue that no response is entirely satisfactory. Finally, I undermine some positive arguments for PII.

AB - Putative counterexamples to the Principle of Identity of Indiscernibles (PII) are notoriously inconclusive. I establish ground rules for debate in this area, offer a new response to such counterexamples for friends of the PII, but then argue that no response is entirely satisfactory. Finally, I undermine some positive arguments for PII.

KW - QUANTITATIVE PARSIMONY

KW - NEUTRAL RELATIONS

KW - PERSISTENCE

KW - THISNESS

KW - PARTS

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/69849129504

UR - http://mind.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/118/469/101

U2 - 10.1093/mind/fzn153

DO - 10.1093/mind/fzn153

M3 - Article

SN - 0026-4423

VL - 118

SP - 101

EP - 119

JO - Mind

JF - Mind

IS - 469

ER -

Identity and Indiscernibility

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this