Abstract
The usefulness of technical analysis, or charting, has been questioned because it flies in the face of the 'random walk' and tests present conflicting results. We examine chartists' decision-making techniques and derive a taxonomy of charting strategies based on investors' market ontologies and calculative strategies. This distinguishes between trend-seekers and pattern-seekers, and trading as a system or an art. We argue that interpretative activity plays a more important role than previously thought and suggest that charting's main appeal for users lies in its power as a heuristic device regardless of its effectiveness at generating returns.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 206-221 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Accounting, Organizations and Society |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 17 Jul 2008 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Feb 2009 |
Keywords
- Efficient capital-markets
- Common-stock investment
- Financial-markets
- Performativity
- Strategies
- Economics
- Sociology
- Exchange