Identification of the impact of crime on physical activity depends upon neighbourhood scale: multilevel evidence from 203,883 Australians

Thomas Astell-Burt*, Xiaoqi Feng, Gregory S. Kolt

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Equivocal findings on crime as a deterrent for physical activity may be due to effects of geographic scale on exposure measurement. To investigate this hypothesis, physical activity was measured in 203,883 Australians and linked to standardised crime counts within small ('Census Collection Districts'; approx. 330 residents) and larger areas ('Statistical Local Areas'; approx. 32,000 residents). A median rate ratio of 226 indicated substantive geographic variation in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Adjusting for confounders, multilevel negative binomial regression reported lower MVPA with more crime consistently in small, but not in larger areas. Reducing small pockets of local crime may encourage more physically active lifestyles.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)120-123
    Number of pages4
    JournalHealth & Place
    Volume31
    Early online date8 Dec 2014
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2015

    Keywords

    • Crime
    • Physical activity
    • Multilevel modelling
    • Geographic scale
    • Mental-health
    • Violent crime
    • Environment
    • Population
    • Mortality
    • Fear
    • Risk

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Identification of the impact of crime on physical activity depends upon neighbourhood scale: multilevel evidence from 203,883 Australians'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this