Abstract
While Amazonian forests are extraordinarily diverse, the abundance of trees is skewed strongly towards relatively few â € hyperdominantâ €™ species. In addition to their diversity, Amazonian trees are a key component of the global carbon cycle, assimilating and storing more carbon than any other ecosystem on Earth. Here we ask, using a unique data set of 530 forest plots, if the functions of storing and producing woody carbon are concentrated in a small number of tree species, whether the most abundant species also dominate carbon cycling, and whether dominant species are characterized by specific functional traits. We find that dominance of forest function is even more concentrated in a few species than is dominance of tree abundance, with only â ‰1% of Amazon tree species responsible for 50% of carbon storage and productivity. Although those species that contribute most to biomass and productivity are often abundant, species maximum size is also influential, while the identity and ranking of dominant species varies by function and by region.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 6857 |
Journal | Nature Communications |
Volume | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 28 Apr 2015 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Hyperdominance in Amazonian forest carbon cycling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: Nature Communications, Vol. 6, 6857, 28.04.2015.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Hyperdominance in Amazonian forest carbon cycling
AU - Fauset, Sophie
AU - Johnson, Michelle O.
AU - Gloor, Manuel
AU - Baker, Timothy R.
AU - Monteagudo M., Abel
AU - Brienen, Roel J.W.
AU - Feldpausch, Ted R.
AU - Lopez-Gonzalez, Gabriela
AU - Malhi, Yadvinder
AU - Ter Steege, Hans
AU - Pitman, Nigel C.A.
AU - Baraloto, Christopher
AU - Engel, Julien
AU - Pétronelli, Pascal
AU - Andrade, Ana
AU - Camargo, José Luís C.
AU - Laurance, Susan G.W.
AU - Laurance, William F.
AU - Chave, Jerôme
AU - Allie, Elodie
AU - Vargas, Percy Núñez
AU - Terborgh, John W.
AU - Ruokolainen, Kalle
AU - Silveira, Marcos
AU - Aymard C., Gerardo A.
AU - Arroyo, Luzmila
AU - Bonal, Damien
AU - Ramirez-Angulo, Hirma
AU - Araujo-Murakami, Alejandro
AU - Neill, David
AU - Hérault, Bruno
AU - Dourdain, Aurélie
AU - Torres-Lezama, Armando
AU - Marimon, Beatriz S.
AU - Salomão, Rafael P.
AU - Comiskey, James A.
AU - Réjou-Méchain, Maxime
AU - Toledo, Marisol
AU - Licona, Juan Carlos
AU - Alarcón, Alfredo
AU - Prieto, Adriana
AU - Rudas, Agustín
AU - Van Der Meer, Peter J.
AU - Killeen, Timothy J.
AU - Marimon Junior, Ben Hur
AU - Poorter, Lourens
AU - Boot, Rene G.A.
AU - Stergios, Basil
AU - Torre, Emilio Vilanova
AU - Costa, Flávia R.C.
AU - Levis, Carolina
AU - Schietti, Juliana
AU - Souza, Priscila
AU - Groot, Nikée
AU - Arets, Eric
AU - Moscoso, Victor Chama
AU - Castro, Wendeson
AU - Coronado, Euridice N.Honorio
AU - Peña-Claros, Marielos
AU - Stahl, Clement
AU - Barroso, Jorcely
AU - Talbot, Joey
AU - Vieira, Ima Célia Guimarães
AU - Van Der Heijden, Geertje
AU - Thomas, Raquel
AU - Vos, Vincent A.
AU - Almeida, Everton C.
AU - Davila, Esteban Álvarez
AU - Aragão, Luiz E.O.C.
AU - Erwin, Terry L.
AU - Morandi, Paulo S.
AU - De Oliveira, Edmar Almeida
AU - Valadão, Marco B.X.
AU - Zagt, Roderick J.
AU - Van Der Hout, Peter
AU - Loayza, Patricia Alvarez
AU - Pipoly, John J.
AU - Wang, Ophelia
AU - Alexiades, Miguel
AU - Cerón, Carlos E.
AU - Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Isau
AU - Di Fiore, Anthony
AU - Peacock, Julie
AU - Camacho, Nadir C.Pallqui
AU - Umetsu, Ricardo K.
AU - De Camargo, Plínio Barbosa
AU - Burnham, Robyn J.
AU - Herrera, Rafael
AU - Quesada, Carlos A.
AU - Stropp, Juliana
AU - Vieira, Simone A.
AU - Steininger, Marc
AU - Rodríguez, Carlos Reynel
AU - Restrepo, Zorayda
AU - Muelbert, Adriane Esquivel
AU - Lewis, Simon L.
AU - Pickavance, Georgia C.
AU - Phillips, Oliver L.
N1 - Funding Information: This paper is a product of the RAINFOR network, supported by a Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation grant, the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (283080, ‘GEOCARBON’; 282664, ‘AMAZALERT’; ERC grant ‘Tropical Forests in the Changing Earth System’), and Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Urgency Grant and NERC Consortium Grants ‘AMAZONICA’ (NE/F005806/1), ‘TROBIT’ (NE/ D005590/1) and ‘Niche evolution of South American trees’ (NE/I028122/1). Additional data were included from the Tropical Ecology Assessment and Monitoring network (a collaboration between Conservation International, the Missouri Botanical Garden, the Smithsonian Institution and the Wildlife Conservation Society, and partly funded by these institutions, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and other donors), the Alwyn H. Gentry Forest Transect Dataset (Missouri Botanical Garden), the PPBio network (supported by PRONEX—FAPEAM/CNPq (1600/2006), Hidroveg FAPESP/ FAPEAM, Universal/CNPq (473308/2009-6) and INCT-CENBAM), the PPBio Biota do Cerrado network (Fitogeografia da Transic¸ão Amazônia/Cerrado CNPq 457602/2012-0), and the CNPq/PELD network (Transic¸ão Amazônia/Cerrado 403725/2012-7). Additional data collection was funded by Investissement d’Avenir grants of the French ANR (CEBA: ANR-10-LABX-0025; TULIP: ANR-10-LABX-0041) and a productivity grant funded by CNPq to BHMJr and BSM. S.F., M.G., M.O.J., G.L.-G. and O.L.P. are partly funded by the NERC project grant ‘ECOFOR’ (grant ref: NE/K01644X/1). O.L.P. is supported by an ERC Advanced Grant and a Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award. R.J.W.B. is funded independently by a research fellowship from NERC (grant ref: NE/I021160/1). L.P., M.P.C. E.A., and M.T. are partially funded by the EU FP7 project ‘ROBIN’ (283093), with co-funding for E.A. from the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs (KB-14-003-030). This is study 653 of the technical series of the BDFFP (INPA/ STRI). The field data summarized here involve contributions from numerous field assistants and rural communities, many of whom have been specifically acknowledged in Mitchard et al. (2014, Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.). We also thank Jon Lloyd, Rodolfo Vásquez Martínez, Olaf Banki, Paul Berry, Wemo Beitan, Lilian Blanc, Foster Brown, Alvaro Cogollo, Fernando Cornejo Valverde, Massiel Corrales Medina, Nallaret Davila Cardozo, Lola da Costa, Renske Ek, Washington Galiano, René Guillén Villaroel, Niro Higuchi, Eliana Jimenez, Antonio S. Lima, João Lima de Freitas Júnior, Adriano Nogueira Lima, Casimiro Mendoza, Walter A. Palacios, Alexander Parada Gutierrez, Guido Pardo, Maria Cristina Peñuela, Freddy Ramirez Arevalo, Victor Rojas, Anand Roopsind, Mario Saldias, James Singh, Daniel Soto, Luis Valenzuela Gamarra, Gorky Villa and Barbara Vinceti. We further thank those colleagues who contributed in many ways but who are no longer with us: Alwyn Gentry, Jean Pierre Veillon, Samuel Almeida, Sandra Patiño and Rai-mundo Saraiva. Publisher Copyright: © 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/4/28
Y1 - 2015/4/28
N2 - While Amazonian forests are extraordinarily diverse, the abundance of trees is skewed strongly towards relatively few â € hyperdominantâ €™ species. In addition to their diversity, Amazonian trees are a key component of the global carbon cycle, assimilating and storing more carbon than any other ecosystem on Earth. Here we ask, using a unique data set of 530 forest plots, if the functions of storing and producing woody carbon are concentrated in a small number of tree species, whether the most abundant species also dominate carbon cycling, and whether dominant species are characterized by specific functional traits. We find that dominance of forest function is even more concentrated in a few species than is dominance of tree abundance, with only â ‰1% of Amazon tree species responsible for 50% of carbon storage and productivity. Although those species that contribute most to biomass and productivity are often abundant, species maximum size is also influential, while the identity and ranking of dominant species varies by function and by region.
AB - While Amazonian forests are extraordinarily diverse, the abundance of trees is skewed strongly towards relatively few â € hyperdominantâ €™ species. In addition to their diversity, Amazonian trees are a key component of the global carbon cycle, assimilating and storing more carbon than any other ecosystem on Earth. Here we ask, using a unique data set of 530 forest plots, if the functions of storing and producing woody carbon are concentrated in a small number of tree species, whether the most abundant species also dominate carbon cycling, and whether dominant species are characterized by specific functional traits. We find that dominance of forest function is even more concentrated in a few species than is dominance of tree abundance, with only â ‰1% of Amazon tree species responsible for 50% of carbon storage and productivity. Although those species that contribute most to biomass and productivity are often abundant, species maximum size is also influential, while the identity and ranking of dominant species varies by function and by region.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928901690&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/ncomms7857
DO - 10.1038/ncomms7857
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84928901690
SN - 2041-1723
VL - 6
JO - Nature Communications
JF - Nature Communications
M1 - 6857
ER -