TY - JOUR
T1 - Hypercanonical Joyce
T2 - Sam Selvon’s The Lonely Londoners, creative disaffiliation, and the global afterlives of Ulysses
AU - Ward, Kiron
PY - 2021/12/16
Y1 - 2021/12/16
N2 - Roughly two-thirds of the way through Sam Selvon’s The Lonely Londoners (1956), there is a section highly redolent of the ‘Penelope’ episode of James Joyce’s Ulysses (1922). Commonly referred to as ‘Summer’, the section’s similarity to ‘Penelope’ has not gone unnoticed among either Joyce or Selvon scholars; to date, however, only J. Dillon Brown (2013) has offered a substantive reading of the connection. This article seizes on the relative absence of critical discussion of Selvon in Joyce studies to consider what might be the particular responsibilities that Joyce studies bears when reading Joyce’s global afterlives. Drawing on critical debates around the concept of global modernism, I discuss the terms of Joyce’s canonisation and his use in ‘diffusionist’ models of literary history. Building on Kandice Chuh’s (2019) analysis of the combined effects of liberal representational politics and hypercanonicity in literary studies, I contend that future studies of Joyce’s global reception and influence should seek to establish mutually transformative intercultural dialogue, which in turn requires opening the field to unsettling Joyce’s position in literary studies – and, to that end, I propose that Selvon’s novel provides an exemplary model of engagement with Joyce through ‘creative disaffiliation’.
AB - Roughly two-thirds of the way through Sam Selvon’s The Lonely Londoners (1956), there is a section highly redolent of the ‘Penelope’ episode of James Joyce’s Ulysses (1922). Commonly referred to as ‘Summer’, the section’s similarity to ‘Penelope’ has not gone unnoticed among either Joyce or Selvon scholars; to date, however, only J. Dillon Brown (2013) has offered a substantive reading of the connection. This article seizes on the relative absence of critical discussion of Selvon in Joyce studies to consider what might be the particular responsibilities that Joyce studies bears when reading Joyce’s global afterlives. Drawing on critical debates around the concept of global modernism, I discuss the terms of Joyce’s canonisation and his use in ‘diffusionist’ models of literary history. Building on Kandice Chuh’s (2019) analysis of the combined effects of liberal representational politics and hypercanonicity in literary studies, I contend that future studies of Joyce’s global reception and influence should seek to establish mutually transformative intercultural dialogue, which in turn requires opening the field to unsettling Joyce’s position in literary studies – and, to that end, I propose that Selvon’s novel provides an exemplary model of engagement with Joyce through ‘creative disaffiliation’.
KW - Molly Bloom
KW - Penelope
KW - Global modernism
KW - Black British writing
KW - Anglophone Caribbean literature
KW - Influence studies
KW - Curricular multiculturalism
KW - Whiteness
U2 - 10.1080/0950236X.2022.2003088
DO - 10.1080/0950236X.2022.2003088
M3 - Article
SN - 0950-236X
VL - 36
SP - 326
EP - 347
JO - Textual Practice
JF - Textual Practice
IS - 2
ER -