@misc{5e13d9ab71b446e1aff789905a07255b,
title = "Humouring imperialism",
abstract = "Since the Cold War, Western literary and educational establishments have reproduced Moscow{\textquoteright}s chauvinist view of Ukrainian culture as a derivative of Russian. That attitude is now politically and morally untenable. Ukrainian culture must be liberated along with the multitude of other Slavic languages and cultures belonging to the post-Soviet space.Following Russia{\textquoteright}s onslaught on Ukraine in early 2022, the novel term {\textquoteleft}rashism{\textquoteright} (рашизм) rapidly coalesced for referring to and negatively assessing the mixed-bag fascist-inflected ideology of neo-imperialism that the Kremlin deploys for justifying and promoting its actions. Yet, in the West too little attention is paid to the Russian language{\textquoteright}s role in this ideology. In English-speaking countries, governments leave language use to citizens and their choices. Language politics is not actively pursued as a goal in itself or as an instrument for furthering a specific policy. In contrast, this is a norm and even the fundament of politics in central and eastern Europe, where the nation – in line with ethnolinguistic nationalism – is defined as all speakers of a language (or speech community).",
keywords = "Russian imperialism, Soviet imperialism, Russian literature, Cultural imperialism, Language policy, Minority rights, Translation studies, Translation politics, Russian propaganda, Russian influence, Russian invasion of Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukrainian literature, Uzbek literature, Tatar literature, Tuvan literature",
author = "Tomasz Kamusella",
year = "2023",
month = feb,
day = "1",
language = "English",
journal = "Eurozine",
issn = "1684-4637",
}